Re: [rkward-devel] RKWard Wiki (permissions)

2009-05-06 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
On Monday 04 May 2009, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > Has anybody tried to log in and edit, yet? If not, could you give that a > try? If there are any problems, let me know, perhaps I need to set some > permissions, somehow. Ouch. It turns out, I have to assign each user to the "editor" group se

[rkward-devel] Release candidate of RKWard 0.4.9b and 0.5.0d

2009-05-06 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi! As announced, in last week's mail, I'm closing the first round of testing for the coming releases of RKWard. Testing has turned up a hand full of issues, some of which have been addressed meanwhile. Other issues remain, and probably will not be fixed for the releases, but at this point I th

Re: [rkward-devel] How to deal with binary packages?

2009-05-06 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, thanks for your feedback in this thread. To summarize, the consensus seems to be to continue to keep the official source release and contributed binary packages separate. The wiki page listing binaries should become more prominent, however. I've tried to make some progress in that directio

Re: [rkward-devel] How to deal with binary packages?

2009-05-06 Thread meik michalke
hi, gosh, i totally forgot to comment on this one: am Freitag, 1. Mai 2009 (03:43) schrieb Prasenjit Kapat: > OK, I am just floating an idea out - why not go for a Launchpad+PPA > archive for all the (K)Ubuntu related packages. It may be "governed" > by a group of volunteer packagers who use (K)U

Re: [rkward-devel] How to deal with binary packages?

2009-05-06 Thread I. Soumpasis
2009/5/6 Thomas Friedrichsmeier > > The launchpad for ubuntu idea suggested by Prasenjit sounds good to me. I > think it probably makes sense to use distribution-specific mechanisms like > this as well, as long as the Binaries and Build Scripts page has the > relevant > and up-to-date instruction