Re: [rkward-devel] rkh file for utility functions

2010-09-20 Thread Prasenjit Kapat
Hi, On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > > I think using an R style documentation might be a good idea after all. First, Does it now look closer to what you have in mind? (It is incomplete still...) Regards, -- Prasenjit ---

Re: [rkward-devel] Request for feedback on new plugin features, and plot history

2010-09-20 Thread Prasenjit Kapat
Hi, On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: >> For "post release" (unless Thomas wants this implemented pre-release) >> features: I would suggest allowing more variables to be selected for >> ordering the data frame. > > Yes, true. The follow-up problem is that you may wan

Re: [rkward-devel] rkh file for utility functions

2010-09-20 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi! On Monday 20 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote: > Does it now look closer to what you have in mind? (It is incomplete > still...) Yes, thanks! For my taste you have quite a lot of links in the "See also" section. I'd omit at least ones like "invisible" and "options", which would relate