Le mercredi 27 août 2014 à 08:42 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 20:56:01 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > OK, I think we are good now. I've added accessors for the
> > old .HTML.file, and this works at least with my package which uses it.
> > The checks l
hi,
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2014, 09:56:14 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> Honestly, I'm not sure I like it. It would look like
> # Getter: OK
> HTMLFile()
> # Setter: weird
> HTMLFile() <- "/my/path"
>
> What do you both think about it? I think R is pretty inconsistent
> already, with par(cex=3)
Le mercredi 27 août 2014 à 14:52 +0200, meik michalke a écrit :
> hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2014, 09:56:14 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> > Honestly, I'm not sure I like it. It would look like
> > # Getter: OK
> > HTMLFile()
> > # Setter: weird
> > HTMLFile() <- "/my/path"
> >
> > What do y
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 14:54:51 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> If Thomas agrees, I'll keep them as they are and send the message to the
> maintainers.
Absolutely. Go ahead!
Regards
Thomas
--
Slashdot TV.
Video for
Dear maintainers of R packages depending on R2HTML,
We (the RKWard team and I) recently took over the maintainership of the
R2HTML package in order to prevent it from being archived on CRAN. To
this goal, we had to make a few (limited) breaking changes, which might
require your packages to be slig
