Hi,
On Monday 01 December 2014 22:11:39 meik michalke wrote:
> here's a refined version, what do think of the restructured comments?
definitely better, IMO. I'd suggest also putting all implicit paramteres on a
single line of the comment, though, so the comment does not push the actual
code out
hi,
thanks for the fast feedback.
Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014, 09:59:12 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> On Monday 01 December 2014 22:11:39 meik michalke wrote:
> > here's a refined version, what do think of the restructured comments?
>
> definitely better, IMO. I'd suggest also putting all
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 December 2014 11:46:52 meik michalke wrote:
> shuffling around elements is no problem, i'll try something. however:
> > - Set the labels of the inputs for custom dec/sep to "" (these are
> > definitely expendable, IMO)
> > - Set the label of the file name selector to "". Probably
Hi!
Just a small random catch:
On Tuesday 02 December 2014 21:54:50 m. eik michalke wrote:
> + var quote = getBoolean("quote");
This works, and is ok. However, the canonical way to deal with checkbox-
options is using
getBoolean("quote.state")
and not specifying any value in the -contr
