Updates:
Labels: Target-2.6.2
Comment #5 on issue 186 by janne.t.harkonen: A mechanism for dynamic
libraries to specify the general library documentation
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=186
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #3 on issue 930 by bryan.oa...@gmail.com: Test case names should
always be cut from the end on console
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=930
How about instead of cutting from the end or cutting from the beginning,
you cut from the middle? So, a long name like
Comment #4 on issue 930 by pekka.klarck: Test case names should always be
cut from the end on console
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=930
Cutting the name from the middle is actually a pretty good idea. It would
probably be enough to just cut from the middle
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 934 by vito...@gmail.com: --include option has AND and NOT but no
OR?
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=934
Dear owner,
When using --include option to include some cases with the tag names, in
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 934 by mikko.ko...@gmail.com: --include option has AND
and NOT but no OR?
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=934
you can do this by adding multiple --include tags
--include A --include B
Revision: 1bbbf8825392
Author: Janne Härkönen
Date: Tue Aug 23 05:06:00 2011
Log: Initial support for intro documentation to dynamic libraries
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=1bbbf8825392
Modified:
/src/robot/running/testlibraries.py
Revision: a19b0d29bd3a
Author: Janne Härkönen
Date: Tue Aug 23 08:37:32 2011
Log: testlibraries: doc cannot be resolved in init yet
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=a19b0d29bd3a
Modified:
/src/robot/running/testlibraries.py
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Usability
New issue 935 by mikko.ko...@gmail.com: Allow Explicit User Keyword Override
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=935
In a project that has multiple similar products in development and same
test cases running for
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 936 by vito...@gmail.com: Could suite(a folder)'s libraries,
resources and so on apply to its belonging suite(files under that folder)?
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=936
When I tried to i
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 936 by pekka.klarck: Could suite(a folder)'s libraries,
resources and so on apply to its belonging suite(files under that folder)?
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=936
We have made a decision not to support thi
Updates:
Status: Pending
Comment #1 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: Allow Explicit User Keyword
Override
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=935
1) Having visibility modifiers is also requested in issue 430. I agree they
would be useful in larger projects but I&#
Updates:
Summary: `Set Resource Search Order` keyword
Status: Accepted
Owner: pekka.klarck
Labels: -Usability Priority-Medium Target-2.6.2
Comment #2 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: `Set Resource Search Order` keyword
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues
3 new revisions:
Revision: f2dad12ecf54
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Thu Aug 25 06:40:46 2011
Log: minor cleanup
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=f2dad12ecf54
Revision: df8274876532
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Thu Aug 25 14:15:45 2011
Log: dead test row
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #3 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: `Set Resource Search Order` keyword
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=935
This issue was updated by revision 8630d04f6d7a.
Working implementation ready and tests (separate commit) are done.
Tasks
2 new revisions:
Revision: 8630d04f6d7a
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Thu Aug 25 15:09:07 2011
Log: Implementation for Set Resource Search Order Keyword...
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=8630d04f6d7a
Revision: 1c7bd2ee3fc8
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Thu
Comment #4 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: `Set Resource Search Order` keyword
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=935
This issue was updated by revision 1c7bd2ee3fc8.
Acceptance tests.
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Target-2.6.2
New issue 937 by pekka.klarck: Generating logs and reports fails with
Jython if crimson.jar is in CLASSPATH
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=937
When crimson.jar is in CLASSPATH, generating
Updates:
Status: Done
Owner: mikko.ko...@gmail.com
Cc: pekka.klarck
Comment #1 on issue 937 by pekka.klarck: Generating logs and reports fails
with Jython if crimson.jar is in CLASSPATH
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=937
This issue was
startElementNS
and endElementNS instead of startElement and endElement. We tried
configuring
the parser to be non-namespace-aware but failed. Implementing the NS methods
seemed to be the easiest solution.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=a9214b6d5e76
Modified:
/src/robot/result
resources
In the end we decided that old `Set Library Search Order` keyword can be
used also for setting the priority between keywords in resources and no new
keyword is needed.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=b9cf2b3fb585
Modified:
/atest/testdata/standard_libraries
Updates:
Summary: `Set Library Search Order` should also support setting priority
between keywords in resources
Comment #5 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: `Set Library Search Order` should
also support setting priority between keywords in resources
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework
Comment #6 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: `Set Library Search Order` should
also support setting priority between keywords in resources
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=935
This issue was updated by revision 213f832b3564.
Now resource/library names in the search order
5 new revisions:
Revision: 213f832b3564
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Fri Aug 26 05:59:46 2011
Log: Fine tuned enhanced Set Library Search Order...
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=213f832b3564
Revision: 6fea7c14674a
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Fri Aug 26 06
Updates:
Status: Done
Comment #7 on issue 935 by pekka.klarck: `Set Library Search Order` should
also support setting priority between keywords in resources
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=935
Updated user guide in revision 81efd6916327 but failed to close
Revision: 2497645faf28
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Fri Aug 26 06:49:21 2011
Log: oops, thought i changed _libname -> libname everywhere but
apparently didn't
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=2497645faf28
Modified:
/src/robot/running/userke
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Usability
New issue 938 by mikko.ko...@gmail.com: Parsing errors should show line
numbers
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=938
Current robot parsing errors can be hard to debug.
For example Resource import (where
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Target-2.7 bwic
New issue 939 by pekka.klarck: Remove possibility to create scalar
variables with list values in variable table
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=939
This functionality was deprecated
2 new revisions:
Revision: 785312bed69d
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 04:53:29 2011
Log: minor refactoring/cleanup
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=785312bed69d
Revision: cb819e666f1a
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 04:56:54 2011
Log
://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=793
Another project reported the same error and this time reproducing it
succeeded.
The IndexError exception occurs when there is a table in the test data that
has only empty cells in its first row. For example following three tables
(first two
Comment #4 on issue 549 by pekka.klarck: Test parser should retain source
line numbers
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=549
Issue 938 has been merged into this issue.
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 549
Comment #1 on issue 938 by pekka.klarck: Parsing errors should show line
numbers
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=938
Retaining the line numbers is issue 549. The cryptic error message was
caused by a bug
2 new revisions:
Revision: 9bf25c8bac85
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 06:28:22 2011
Log: format
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=9bf25c8bac85
Revision: 70278c58acb9
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 06:38:21 2011
Log: format
http
2 new revisions:
Revision: 0b089e32a2ae
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 12:21:42 2011
Log: Tests for handling invalid table names correctly...
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=0b089e32a2ae
Revision: 2c46c1307722
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29
Comment #8 on issue 793 by pekka.klarck: Tables with only empty cells in
the first row cause `IndexError`
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=793
This issue was updated by revision 2c46c1307722.
Fixed. Will still do small refactoring in a separate commit.
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: pekka.klarck
Comment #7 on issue 793 by pekka.klarck: Tables with only empty cells in
the first row cause `IndexError`
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=793
This issue was updated by revision 0b089e32a2ae.
Acceptance
2 new revisions:
Revision: 9ffb7cb9897f
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 12:53:33 2011
Log: added doc for a test
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=9ffb7cb9897f
Revision: c32aa51e714d
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 12:55:08 2011
Log
Updates:
Status: Done
Comment #9 on issue 793 by pekka.klarck: Tables with only empty cells in
the first row cause `IndexError`
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=793
This issue was updated by revision c32aa51e714d.
Refactored. And thus Done.
rlier been changed to 'Invalid test data in
file...' in the code but not in tests. Hopefully this fixes the build.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=23c04408185b
Modified:
/atest/robot/core/invalid_syntax.txt
/atest/robot/core/resource_and
2 new revisions:
Revision: 9bce64a69ff0
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 13:23:11 2011
Log: Don't start XML if suite is not run at all
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=9bce64a69ff0
Revision: 616bd0a10ff2
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug
Updates:
Status: Done
Owner: pekka.klarck
Comment #6 on issue 923 by pekka.klarck: Broken XML output file is created
when no test case matched given --include/--exclude or --test/--suite
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=923
This issue was updated by
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Target-2.6.2
New issue 940 by pekka.klarck: `Import Variables` keyword should import
variable files even if they are already imported
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=940
Let's assume we hav
3 new revisions:
Revision: 283999ca7c34
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Aug 29 14:32:51 2011
Log: Noticed typo 'varible' in one place. Grep revealed that it was
nearly ...
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=283999ca7c34
Revision: a50fa33c0a30
Autho
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 941 by acampb...@ltufz.com: Get Library Instance instantiating
2nd library instance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=941
'Get library instance' Keyword Documentation: Returns the curren
Comment #1 on issue 941 by acampb...@ltufz.com: Get Library Instance
instantiating 2nd library instance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=941
Sorry, just to note,
I can provide additional information as necessary. Checking the source, it
appears that all
5 new revisions:
Revision: 7f612f6d8bf8
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Wed Aug 31 06:48:21 2011
Log: moved parse logic from reader to parser
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=7f612f6d8bf8
Revision: b96ba9e9a911
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Wed Aug 31 07:02:12
Status: Accepted
Owner: pekka.klarck
CC: janne.t.harkonen
Labels: Type-Enhancement Target-2.6.2 Priority-High
New issue 942 by pekka.klarck: Support parsing HTML using `lxml` module to
get better performance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=942
Third party lxml module
Updates:
Status: Review
Comment #2 on issue 942 by pekka.klarck: Support parsing HTML using `lxml`
module to get better performance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=942
This issue was updated by revision 816d626211a2.
Here is finally the new lxml based parser
Comment #1 on issue 942 by pekka.klarck: Support parsing HTML using `lxml`
module to get better performance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=942
This issue was updated by revision adbc8bc8374e.
Enhanced unit tests so that relevant tests are run both against the old
7 new revisions:
Revision: 17293b5b43e8
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Wed Aug 31 13:22:56 2011
Log: better test entity and char refs through reader - can hopefully
run sa...
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=17293b5b43e8
Revision: a2c85110960d
Author: Pekka
Comment #3 on issue 942 by janne.t.harkonen: Support parsing HTML using
`lxml` module to get better performance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=942
Code itself looks fine.
On my own machine with Python 2.7 and lxml 2.3, two acceptance tests are
failing because of
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Low
New issue 943 by spielman...@googlemail.com: Enhance for loop documentation
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=943
As mentioned by Piotr Nestorow
(http://groups.google.com/group/robotframework-devel
Updates:
Status: New
Comment #1 on issue 943 by spielman...@googlemail.com: Enhance for loop
documentation
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=943
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #27 on issue 539 by spielman...@googlemail.com: Problems with
installation on Windows 7
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=539
Since > 4 months have passed without any further findings, I'd like to call
this issue resolved unless anyone objects. Opinions?
Comment #4 on issue 919 by spielman...@googlemail.com: Jython start-up
performance optimization
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=919
If you need help on the Java part, let me know, maybe I can spare some time
together with a colleague to investigate Jython problems.
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #3 on issue 887 by pekka.klarck: OperatinSystem.Create_Directory
Does not work well with UNC paths as an argument.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=887
Closing due to lack of information.
Comment #28 on issue 539 by pekka.klarck: Problems with installation on
Windows 7
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=539
How is the installation on Win7 nowadays. Are there still problems?
Comment #5 on issue 919 by pekka.klarck: Jython start-up performance
optimization
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=919
If you have a change to profile Jython's start-up it would be awesome. From
Robot's point of view just making Jython faster to start wo
Comment #2 on issue 865 by pekka.klarck: Faster and more memory efficient
log and report generation with rebot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=865
This requires too big changes to be done in 2.6.x minor release.
Updates:
Labels: -Target-2.6.2 Target-2.7
Comment #3 on issue 865 by pekka.klarck: Faster and more memory efficient
log and report generation with rebot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=865
And it would be good to also change the target release to match my
Comment #29 on issue 539 by bryan.oa...@gmail.com: Problems with
installation on Windows 7
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=539
I was able to install using the 32 bit installer. The 64 bit installer was
unable to find my python installation in the registry.
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Target-2.6.2
New issue 944 by pekka.klarck: `Import Resource` keyword fails to import
variables unless used in suite setup
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=944
If Import Resource keyword is used directly
Comment #30 on issue 539 by spielman...@googlemail.com: Problems with
installation on Windows 7
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=539
I haven't seen the original problem (empty error message, Python working
fine anyway) again. I did have the problem describ
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 945 by jp.caixa...@gmail.com: Allow changing tags in suite setup
so test execution is influenced.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=945
Hi,
This request is opened after a question in
Issue 826: Cleaner public API for executing test cases
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=826
This issue is now blocking issue 945.
See http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=945
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low
Blockedon: 826
Comment #1 on issue 945 by pekka.klarck: Allow changing tags in suite setup
so test execution is influenced.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=945
Dynamically
Comment by sourab...@gmail.com:
Any information about when Excel Library will be ready to use ??
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/wiki/TestLibraries
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 946 by timco...@gmail.com: examplelibrary.py for RemoteServer has
incomplete list comprehension
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=946
examplelibrary.py on this page: http://bit.ly/oAKga4
includes
Updates:
Labels: Target-2.7
Comment by pekka.klarck:
This issue is slightly backwards incompatible and thus safer to do in a
major release.
Affected issues:
issue 576: Parsing model enhancements
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=576
issue 645: Empty
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 947 by bobobr...@googlemail.com: Invalid output.xml file
generated by pybot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=947
On "Robot 2.6.1 (Python 2.7.1 on win32)
Unfortunatly i have to complain abou
Comment #2 on issue 941 by acampb...@ltufz.com: Get Library Instance
instantiating 2nd library instance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=941
On further inspection, this was a library scoping issue. Adding
ROBOT_LIBRARY_SCOPE = 'GLOBAL' fixed it.
I was
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 948 by sourab...@gmail.com: Running selected cases from multiple
test suite
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=948
Hi,
I am using Robot Framework 2.6.0 (Python 2.6.4 on win32) on Windows XP.
I tried
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 949 by vaira20s...@gmail.com: Crashing while running python
scripts
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=949
Hi all,
I have a python script which calls my dll(build using cygwin). I could run
the
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 948 by pekka.klarck: Running selected cases from
multiple test suite
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=948
1) You said you tried first
pybot --test TC1 Suite1.html --test TC2 Suite2.html
and then
pybot
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 949 by pekka.klarck: Crashing while running python
scripts
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=949
1) The description doesn't make any sense. You say "It is not executing the
following lines." and the
Updates:
Status: Pending
Comment #1 on issue 947 by pekka.klarck: Invalid output.xml file generated
by pybot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=947
Does this happen every time? Could you create a simple example that
demonstrates this problem and we could run
xed. Thanks for the
report!
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=c1a555023a3d
Modified:
/tools/remoteserver/example/examplelibrary.py
===
--- /tools/remoteserver/example/examplelibrary.py Thu May 26 14:06:43 2011
+++ /tools/remot
Updates:
Status: Done
Comment #1 on issue 946 by pekka.klarck: examplelibrary.py for RemoteServer
has incomplete list comprehension
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=946
This issue was updated by revision c1a555023a3d.
I had broken this revision 624b3b41b8d7
/robotframework/issues/detail?id=943
I agree it would be good to add a note about this to the User Guide:
http://robotframework.googlecode.com/hg/doc/userguide/RobotFrameworkUserGuide.html#for-loops
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #3 on issue 941 by pekka.klarck: Get Library Instance instantiating
2nd library instance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=941
Since you are talking about instances I assume your DbusLibrary is
implemented as a class and thus
Comment #2 on issue 948 by sourab...@gmail.com: Running selected cases from
multiple test suite
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=948
Hi Pekka,
But my problem is :
" pybot --test TC1 Suite1.html --test TC2 Suite2.html
Instead of running TC1 from Suite1 and TC2
Comment #2 on issue 949 by vaira20s...@gmail.com: Crashing while running
python scripts
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=949
Pekka,
Thanks for your response
1. Sorry I forgot to add the lines. Here it is:
print "DLL Loaded"
I was trying to say that, even
Comment #3 on issue 948 by pekka.klarck: Running selected cases from
multiple test suite
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=948
The main problem is that as explained in the User Guide sections I pointed
to you
pybot --test TC1 Suite1.html --test TC2 Suite2.html
Comment by pekka.klarck:
[http://code.google.com/p/robotframework-excellibrary Excel library] is not
developed by the core team and we don't know what's its situation. Possibly
the author is on robotframework-users mailing list so you could ask about
the library there.
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Priority-High Type-Defect Target-2.6.2
New issue 950 by pekka.klarck: XML output can corrupt if library uses
Python's `logging` module in threads
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=950
A strange problem related to XML output
Updates:
Labels: bwic
Comment #1 on issue 950 by pekka.klarck: XML output can corrupt if library
uses Python's `logging` module in threads
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=950
Assuming this is fixed by dropping log messages from non-main threads we
also
Comment #2 on issue 947 by pekka.klarck: Invalid output.xml file generated
by pybot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=947
Are you possibly using SSHLibrary or some other library that uses Python's
`logging` module in threads either directly or via some tool? I
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 951 by palani.s...@gmail.com: Data driven test case results
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=951
At present, the results are not prepared each test entry as a testcase for
test template.
User
Comment #3 on issue 947 by bobobr...@googlemail.com: Invalid output.xml
file generated by pybot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=947
Hi Pekka, yes this issue seems to be related to usage of SSH library.
I wasn't aware of Issue 950
Comment #4 on issue 947 by bobobr...@googlemail.com: Invalid output.xml
file generated by pybot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=947
I can also confirn that after usage of fixml rebot creates log and report
files
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 952 by marcin.k...@gmail.com: Parallel execution of Test Cases
using N treads
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=952
It would be great feature to be able to run test cases parallel with option
Comment #2 on issue 950 by mikko.ko...@gmail.com: XML output can corrupt if
library uses Python's `logging` module in threads
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=950
I saw similar regression today with a listener that internally used python
logging modu
Revision: 6cc62af509f7
Author: Pekka Klärck
Date: Mon Sep 12 03:57:05 2011
Log: atdd cycle
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=6cc62af509f7
Added:
/doc/images/atdd.png
===
--- /dev/null
+++ /doc/images/atdd.pngMon
Updates:
Summary: Parallel execution of Test Cases using N treads
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 952 by pekka.klarck: Parallel execution of Test Cases
using N treads
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=952
We have made an early decision to keep this
Comment #3 on issue 950 by pekka.klarck: XML output can corrupt if library
uses Python's `logging` module in threads
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=950
Issue 947 has been merged into this issue.
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 950
Comment #5 on issue 947 by pekka.klarck: Invalid output.xml file generated
by pybot
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=947
Ok, merging this with issue 950. No wonder you weren't aware of that issue
since
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 951 by pekka.klarck: Data driven test case results
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=951
As I explained on the mailing list [1] the current behavior is intentional.
If you want to have separate tests in statistics
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Target-2.6.2
New issue 953 by pekka.klarck: Listener logging using logging APIs in its
`log_message` method causes crash due recursion
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=953
Execution crashes for a recursion
ocumenting the lxml support would have requires some additional work.
- Parsing the same data in a plain text files was still 50% faster than
parsing it in HTML with lxml. People with large test suites should switch
to plain text format.
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/source/detail?r=16
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: .@Gmail.com
Comment #4 on issue 942 by pekka.klarck: Support parsing HTML using `lxml`
module to get better performance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=942
This issue was updated by revision 166ba7bc2fdd.
Although lxml
Updates:
Owner: ---
Cc: -janne.t.harkonen
Labels: -Target-2.6.2
Comment #5 on issue 942 by pekka.klarck: Support parsing HTML using `lxml`
module to get better performance
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=942
(No comment was entered for this
1 - 100 of 13065 matches
Mail list logo
