Re: note: db upgrade for 1.3

I believe this is consistent with the conventions we had *earlier* agreed on in http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Proposal_ReleaseNumberingConvention I think it would be a bad idea to prohibit all db schema changes to full major X.0 versions. We've so far used X.Y versions

Re: note: db upgrade for 1.3

In this particular case, I'm -1 on this change. It's to avoid an error with MySQL 5, and my guess is most people aren't using this database. It's good to look ahead and plan ahead, but I think it's more important to worry about existing users - who are likely on an older version of MySQL and

Roller 2.0 screenshots

I've been working like crazy to finish up the Roller 2.0 UI and it's ready for some review. I've posted some screenshots to my blog and I'm preparing a standalone demo. http://www.rollerweblogger.org/page/roller? entry=roller_2_0_screenshots Here is a summary of the major changes I made.

Re: Sharing some stats

The URL rewriting that I'm talking about is used more with WordPress. Wordpress has an index.php that takes parameters for everything like yeah, monthnum, day, feed, etc. Now what they do is to provide a sample .htaccess file that allows the user to have nice URLs like /archives/2005/06/05/123

Re: Roller 2.0 screenshots

Nice Job Dave. Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I've been working like crazy to finish up the Roller 2.0 UI and it's ready for some review. I've posted some screenshots to my blog and I'm preparing a standalone demo. entry=roller_2_0_screenshots Here is a summary of the major changes I

Re: Sharing some stats

On 8/16/05, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then we could write RewriteRules in Apache that translated these for example: http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/Weblog?catname=General into http://www.jroller.com/static-content/fate/general/index.html Suggestion: write the static version to

Roller 2.0 Public Release

I know this may be too much to ask for but when will Roller 2.0 be officially released? - Ransford paksegu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice Job Dave. Dave Johnson wrote:I've been working like crazy to finish up the Roller 2.0 UI and it's ready for some review. I've posted some screenshots to my

RE: Safe UserName characters

Wouldn't the string of allowed characters be gigantic? There are 95,156 characters in Unicode 3.2, though I'm unsure how many would be needed on an allowed characters list. Perhaps for limited situations, like (A-Z,-,@), this might work. Kenneth M. Kolano Technology Architecture Innovation

Re: Safe UserName characters

What we really need is a algorithm for determining if a username (or in 2.0 a webloghandle) is safe to use in a URL. Any pointers? - Dave On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Kolano, Kenneth M. wrote: Wouldn't the string of allowed characters be gigantic? There are 95,156 characters in Unicode

Re: Roller 2.0 screenshots

The new color scheme kind of looks like my Roller project site I am working on Lance Lavandowska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Indeed, it does look good, and I really like the simplified menus. Where did you get the new color scheme? Nice! Lance __

build tests

Hello, I was experimenting on building the roller source. I performed 'build tests' and the following following BUILD FAILED. Any suggestions. Thanks. build-test: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\develop\roller\build\tests [mkdir] Created dir: C:\develop\roller\build\tests\logs [mkdir] Created dir: