On Nov 9, 2005, at 3:18 AM, Miguel A Paraz wrote:
On 11/8/05, David M Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've started talking about what we want to do for the Roller 2.1
releases and proposals are popping up on the wiki. Allen and I have
some feature commitments for December, so that would be a
How about naming it as rollerComments that should will do for all various
databases
Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I am okay with this these db changes
as well, however I think we should
rename the comment table to something a little more appropriate, like
roller_weblogcomments. We may
Hi,
I would like to add ping and one-time aggregation functionality to
Planet Roller. A blog or other source will send in a ping with a feed.
The source can opt to send a special feed containing only one item.
This is tied up with my hacks to support GeoInfo and Google Maps. I
can send to the
Miguel A Paraz wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add ping and one-time aggregation functionality to
Planet Roller. A blog or other source will send in a ping with a feed.
The source can opt to send a special feed containing only one item.
This is tied up with my hacks to support GeoInfo and Google
On 11/9/05, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't quite understand the intended functionality. Extending Planet
to allow it to aggregate loosely affiliated sets of blogs rather than
only specifically configured communities seems like it a valuable
addition. Spam becomes a concern
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:52, Dave Johnson wrote:
For a minor release:
1) there is no need for a long-running database upgrade script that
could
cause a site to have a significant downtime during the upgrade.
2) after the upgrade from X.A to X.B, it should be possible to revert to
the X.A
On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:52, Dave Johnson wrote:
Did we really mean to completely forbid any database changes at all
in minor releases? If so, comment moderation is going to have to wait
for 3.0.
yes, that was my intention, but that is
On 11/9/05, Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:52, Dave Johnson wrote:
Did we really mean to completely forbid any database changes at all
in minor releases? If so, comment moderation is going to have to wait
