I retested my upgrade and I didn't see these errors. Is it possible
that you had arrived at your 1.3 database schema via a development build
of the schema that didn't include all of the indices?
This happened to me on two different indices.
ERROR 1091 (42000): Can't DROP
On 11/14/05, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I retested my upgrade and I didn't see these errors. Is it possible
that you had arrived at your 1.3 database schema via a development build
of the schema that didn't include all of the indices?
This happened to me on two different indices.
Hey guys. We're in the process of trying to migrate to Roller 2.0 and
also ran into some of the indices problems. Easily resolved, but there
are other issues.
1) Just visiting / doesn't appear to redirect to main.do or forward to
main.jsp like it used to. We'd like to not have a hard
Just a followup, it could be that the frontpage lists old entries
because it can only find one user with a handle and so is only listing
those users. If you hit it in the next hour or so,
http://rr.javalobby.org:20900 should be up for testing. It also appears
that hitting the site from
This is a point of debate actually.
There are a number of pages throughout the editor UI where a specific page does
not show the tabs. I don't remember all of them, but I know the invite user
and edit template pages are examples.
Personally, I think this is a UI mistake and that we should be
On Nov 14, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
This is a point of debate actually.
I don't debate this one anymore. I agree with Allen and Matt that pages
should have the tabs.
We can probably handle this one in Roller 2.1 since it would require a
reasonable amount of work to put
If you want to keep up with changes to Roller docs and proposals, put
this in your newsfeed reader: http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/rss.rdf
For the bug tracking system (JIRA), this gives a feed of recently added
bugs:
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/roller/secure/
can we also do a full merge of the 1.3 branch into the 2.0. luckily i just
noticed that one of the final changes that i made in the 1.3 branch hasn't
actually been merged into 2.0.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 10:10, Dave Johnson wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
Licensing is an important issue for the ASF. As one person recently put it,
The [Apache License] and the ASF exist to provide not only world-changing
software, but also software that has as few restrictions and conditions as
possible to encourage (and promote) universal usage in both commercial
On Nov 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Matthew Schmidt wrote:
Just a followup, it could be that the frontpage lists old entries
because it can only find one user with a handle and so is only listing
those users. If you hit it in the next hour or so,
http://rr.javalobby.org:20900 should be up for
On 11/14/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
findbugs = ?? is this a must? how do we use it?
I'd like to kill this one soon if possible. Seems unnecessary.
I introduced FindBugs, but if no one is using it, feel free to remove it.
There's a bug (ROL-893) that highlights a fundamental problem in the
coding of the TopicTagPlugin, but also perhaps an issue in the plugin
interface and its instantiation model, which is what I wanted to discuss.
Going back in the SVN history, it appears that the instantiation model
hasn't
I'll try mapping the request filter to /index.jsp and see what happens.
That might be enough to get it jumpstarted. As for the database, I
think it was pretty close to stock. We may have added a new indices or
two in the last two weeks and other than the four missing indices, it
seemed to
Anil, you are correct about this instantiation problem. I had actually
found this same problem when I was debugging that strange null entry
bug we were having a couple weeks ago. I completely agree that this is
broken and those plugins should be instantiated once per request and not
shared.
Dave Johnson wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Matthew Schmidt wrote:
Just a followup, it could be that the frontpage lists old entries
because it can only find one user with a handle and so is only
listing those users. If you hit it in the next hour or so,
Matthew,
I am assuming you did this upgrade on the jRoller system db? or is this
on a test system with only a few blogs?
The upgrade sql script doesn't actually come with any sql that migrates
the necessary data from a 1.3 db into the new tables and columns for a
2.0 db. That part of the
On Nov 14, 2005, at 10:19 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
If the current instantiation problem is causing an outstanding bug
then I am fine with just commiting a smaller fix for 2.0, but I would
like to see something more elaborate happen in the long run.
+1 to that.
The PageHelper was changed
17 matches
Mail list logo
