Re: OK with AAPP to sandbox? (Re: proposal + patch: atom admin publishing protocol

2006-02-12 Thread Henri Yandell
+1, but we need to ge ta software grant from Jeff. Hen On 2/6/06, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 07:10, David M Johnson wrote: I've taken a look at Jeff Blattman's Atom Administrative Publishing Protocol (AAPP) and it looks good, and definitely enough

OK with AAPP to sandbox? (Re: proposal + patch: atom admin publishing protocol

2006-02-06 Thread David M Johnson
I've taken a look at Jeff Blattman's Atom Administrative Publishing Protocol (AAPP) and it looks good, and definitely enough to add to the sandbox. * It adds important new remote admin features that we need as standard features in Roller * It follows the same architectural patterns as the

Re: OK with AAPP to sandbox? (Re: proposal + patch: atom admin publishing protocol

2006-02-06 Thread Anil Gangolli
+1 David M Johnson wrote: I've taken a look at Jeff Blattman's Atom Administrative Publishing Protocol (AAPP) and it looks good, and definitely enough to add to the sandbox. * It adds important new remote admin features that we need as standard features in Roller * It follows the same

Re: OK with AAPP to sandbox? (Re: proposal + patch: atom admin publishing protocol

2006-02-06 Thread Matt Raible
+1 On 2/6/06, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 David M Johnson wrote: I've taken a look at Jeff Blattman's Atom Administrative Publishing Protocol (AAPP) and it looks good, and definitely enough to add to the sandbox. * It adds important new remote admin features that we

Re: OK with AAPP to sandbox? (Re: proposal + patch: atom admin publishing protocol

2006-02-06 Thread Allen Gilliland
+1 On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 07:10, David M Johnson wrote: I've taken a look at Jeff Blattman's Atom Administrative Publishing Protocol (AAPP) and it looks good, and definitely enough to add to the sandbox. * It adds important new remote admin features that we need as standard features