[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7133

2009-02-20 Thread matt
r7133 | matt | 2009-02-20 08:24:25 -0500 (Fri, 20 Feb 2009) | 2 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/webcit/static/summaryview.js M /trunk/webcit/static/wclib.js * add a strcmp function, use for mailbox subject/sender compare

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7133

2009-02-20 Thread dothebart
I declare Ready for beta.

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7133

2009-02-20 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
All of your issues are taken care of? How about you, Matt? On the server side I'm comfortable with where we are right now. Has everything been tested in IE6, IE7, and Safari/Opera/Chrome/etc ??

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7122

2009-02-20 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Go for it. It would be a good sell in MS environments. That's part of the goal. I recently spoke to someone who had done some independent research about Citadel and he told me that when people discuss Citadel it's generally positive, but the one thing that they complain about is the

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7133

2009-02-20 Thread dothebart
the important ones, yes. No more open ie6/7 ff issues. the mailbox sorting was the last obvious bug, saving the sort state is still missing. chome/konqueror/opera aren't hapy yet, But I think its a limitation we can live with for our fist beta. If there were no more bugs, we wouldn't need

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7135

2009-02-20 Thread dothebart
r7135 | dothebart | 2009-02-20 13:20:58 -0500 (Fri, 20 Feb 2009) | 2 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/libcitadel/debian/changelog + add beta tag to debs

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7141

2009-02-20 Thread dothebart
r7141 | dothebart | 2009-02-20 17:14:54 -0500 (Fri, 20 Feb 2009) | 2 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/webcit/groupdav_delete.c M /trunk/webcit/roomops.c * silence some warnings. Why do 'may be used uninitialized' ones