> Nov 17 2010 3:32am from samjam @uncnsrd in Mail> to
> room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org
>Subject: Re: (no subject)
>
>On 16/11/10 22:29, dothebart wrote:
>>
>> Ok, most of the needed bugfixes were cherry-picked into stable-78x.
>>
>> this one i'd like to dis
> Nov 13 2010 7:58am from dothebart @uncnsrd
>7 uid store 14 +FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen).
>
>##
>T 85.88.5.81:144 -> 80.134.77.32:64212 [AP]
>* 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen)).
>7 OK UID STORE completed.
>
>Â
>
>is it right we reply with FETCH on a uid store request?
> Nov 9 2010 9:08pm from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
>Subject: Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated.
>826932b012c26b5ef97a5bbf45acf10fca6acc60
> >so far? imaptest and thunderbird.
>
> Until you've also tested Outlook, Pine, whatever Apple is using these
>days, and a
Hi -
This patch should be closer in line w/ the below suggestions. Let me know if
this looks good/additional suggestions.
I'm only addressing the command loop in this one; will hit the other
applicable modules down the road.
- Stu
> Sat Sep 18 2010 02:48:05 PM EDT from
This patch eliminates a backtrace from being generated every time a client disconnects while the server is writing... noticed excessive backtraces every time a premature disconnect occured. This should clean up user logs and eliminates possible confusion (some might think the thread is crashing).
Hi -
I've been looking at enabling the ability for Citadel to log the session ID, hostname, and user for commands being executed, et al. This will help sysadmins integrate IP blocking for dictionary attacks against the database as well as being able to associate commands being logged (for those o
d could be done somewhere near the place the IP is fetched from the socket properties to a static string on CC, so %s in the printf string works out; smtp_data should use that string too.
TIA,
dothebart
Sa Sep 18 2010 04:11:40 EDT von scianos @ Uncensored Betreff: Patch to begin ip address/session
Excellent feedback - would definitely be willing to provide. I've used Citadel for a long time, figure it's time to start contributing back :)
Sat Sep 18 2010 07:53:45 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Patch to eliminate backtrace if client disconnects in client_write
Stu,
sinc
> Sep 3 2010 10:23am from Art Cancro to
> room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org
>Subject: Commit log refs/heads/master
>
>Files: b6938b71c266f458180103090af0ab72e3d9616c citadel/citadel.h
>citadel/include/dtds/user-defs.h
citadel/textclient/citadel.c > citadel/textclient/r
>That's great! Absolutely great! I can now use webcit to view
>mailboxes with thousands of messages. Also, lately I've notice
>everything much faster! I don't know if my vhoster has moved me to
>better hardware or if citadel has just got lots better.
I can confirm that it is in fac
Sorry about the delay in getting these logs... Had my workstation decide to melt down (or at least the CPU, literally... thankfully Intel has a 3 year warranty...)
Logs are attached. At the end of foolog_IMAPS.3 and foolog_IMAPS.4 it appears that we might (and I stress might, because I have no id
> Aug 17 2010 11:05pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
>Subject: Re: Unusual SSL behavior, likely bug
>if you compile citadel with
>
>'-D BIGBAD_IODBG'
>
>as one of your CFLAGS, it will write a transscript of what its doing
>on al IO chanels to /tmp/modulename_fd_random
>
>th
Hi -
Looks like I've got a real zinger of a corner case... Have discovered some unusual behavior in the IMAP server which only exposes itself if SSL or TLS encryption is being used. When using Evolution to move a single or group of message(s) selected via a custom query folder, Citadel ends up se
FYI - It looks like the issue with PINE/Alpine are fixed in the most recent
easy install.
- Stu
> Jul 21 2010 9:56am from ajc to
> room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org
>Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 8703
>
>r8703 | ajc | 2010-07-21 12:56:29 -0400 (Wed, 21 Jul 2010) | 1 line
>Changed pat
> Jul 20 2010 2:18pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
>Subject: Re:
>could you ngrep / tcpdum a non ssl'ed communication with a dummy
>password?
>
>http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/faq:mastering_your_os:net_sniff
>
Sure... Will do tonight.
> Jul 20 2010 2:16pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
>Subject: Re:
>
Looks like I'm seeing failures on IMAP partial fetch here... Citadel is
returning
a null response after upgrading to 7.80. Also tried the newest 7.81.
To replicate, use Alpine to view messages with Quell-Partial-Fetch set to
off.
This is a regression from the previous branch. If you can
>2) could be circumvented by writing on another file than we read, and
>then swap the actual files
>
This tactic would also improve ACID compliance/issues with some newer
filesystems... EXT4 and XFS as examples. With XFS, for instance, if a filesystem
is unmounted uncleanly, files whi
> Jan 10 2010 7:44am from dothebart @uncnsrd
>Subject: Subversion
>Â
>> So Jan 10 2010 10:08:07 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff:
>>Subversion
>>
>>
>>
>>What tools are people using to access Subversion?
>>
>>Are you using the command line or some
> Dec 18 2009 8:15pm from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
>I guess you can email me the details if there's a security problem. If
>it's really something that can't be fixed in a compatible way, then
>we'll change the command name. Old clients will fall back to
>unencrypted connecti
> Nov 2 2009 11:40am from davew @uncnsrd
>Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7989
>Â
>> Mon Nov 02 2009 11:54:17 AM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
>>Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7989
>>
>>
>>My test server now spits out "Server
> Nov 2 2009 2:23am from davew @uncnsrd
>Subject: Re: Spider Monkey
>Â
>> Sun Nov 01 2009 11:28:50 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
>>Subject: Re: Spider Monkey
>>
>>Even so, I'm still inclined to avoid using it for anything other
than
>>the par
> Oct 25 2009 4:19am from davew @uncnsrd
>Subject: Spider Monkey
>I've been looking at the Spide Monkey documentation.
>
>For simple apps that don't use threads it is self contained.
>
>For multithreading apps like us we need NSPR as well so I guess thats
the
>pla
> Oct 17 2009 9:54am from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
>Hmm. I wonder if now is the time to take that Big Bloated Step (tm)
>we've been contemplating for a few years, and bind a scripting engine
>into the system?
>
>
Like an open source Lotus Notes!
- Stu
Sorry about that - cancel the last message. Accidentally hit Enter and
saved a message that I meant to erase!
Hi -
Hi -
I would second keeping 0 as the exit code. This is "standard knowledge" and
would significantly increase needless questions... as well as possibly "turn
off" those new to Citadel due to the initial stress caused by using the
non-standard values in the first place.
- Stu
> Mon Apr 06 2
Hi -
That looks very useful! I will check out the possibilities for integration as
soon as I get some spare time on my hands.
- Stu
> Sat Jan 31 2009 06:17:58 AM EST from dothebart <> Subject: Re:
>mod_auth_citadel
>
> Hy Stu, please have a look at:
>http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/d
Hi -
I just got a box with Suse installed on it configured. I'm going to go ahead
and try to troubleshoot - most likely, there's a bug in the autoconf script
that's not autodetecting the location of the openssl headers.
- Stu
> Sat Jan 31 2009 07:49:49 AM EST from BOFHMike <> Subject: Re:
> Jan 24 2009 4:12pm from BOFHMike @mycastlewall (My Castle Wall)
>Subject: mod_auth_citadel
>I got en error when trying to ./configure --with-apr=/usr/lib
>
>checking Apache APR Version 1 is REQUIRED. Checking for APR... error
>configure: error: Bad path to Apache
> Dec 31 2008 8:10pm from dothebart @uncnsrd
>Subject: SELinux support for Citadel now available for testing
>stu, Google already found you in advance, I've already added you to
>
>http://www.citadel.org/doku.php?id=installation:start#optional.dependencies
>
>and
Hi -
SELinux support is now available for Citadel, and should be ready to test.
These modules are for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and CENTOS 5. Other
distributions will follow.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/citadelselinux/
This allows Citadel to run in its own domain on SELinux servers, and
con
Sorry about the confusion. I just had a chance to look at the library and it
looks as though I jumped the gun.
The reason for mention was that the struct strbuf is defined as part of the
standard headers on many systems. Since the struct being added in Citadel is
named StrBuf, there shouldn't be
Wouldn't the use of STRBUF break some cross compatibility?
- - -
good job; just a tiny note, since strbuf is ratehr new, some casts into
const
char* are there to get a quick transition, the better way is most
possibly to
give it into functions as deep as you can while writ
Sorry about the wording below - not enough coffee today - I meant that as a
question so that I can correctly write these scripts!
- Stu
>Wed Sep 17 2008 01:31:42 EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Concurrency in FSCK/Refcount adjustments?
>
>
>
>Hi -
>
>I'm assuming, based on my reading
Hi -
I'm assuming, based on my reading of the code and its output, that it parses
the entire database and updates the reference counts system wide. I'm
assuming it is correct to run that after restoring from backups taken on a
running database (i.e. restoring database and logs sequentially).
- St
Hi -
I was testing out some backup/restore scripts that I've been using to
simulate crash/recovery scenarios. I run the backups while the system is live
as my backup window is too long, and wanted to determine what my worst-case
recovery situation would involve. It was just per chance that I notic
Hi -
I just noticed somthing unusual... I was running the FSCK command to
adjust my refcounts on a test database, and noticed that there may be
bogus refcounts being generated if this command is run at the same time
that a message is received or posted - resulting in duplicates.
Is
Unusual data corruption error
Greetings -
I have been tracking an unusual corruption issue affecting IMAP renames
on folders starting with numberic values (currently when interacting with
PINE/ALPINE as the client). When renaming a folder named "2008 Action
Completed" to "20
Great! I'll try it out against my build. I have access to Thunderbird (in use
here), Evolution (which I use personally), Alpine/Pine (also in use here),
Outlook, Outlook Express, and three PalmOS clients (VersaMail, Chatter - used
by me personally, and Snapper - which has the CBC countermeasure bug
Hi -
Just wanted to get some feedback to see if a patch for the following issue
would be OK to incorporate... If it is OK, I can code it and submit for
inclusion...
While testing connection from PalmOS using the Certicom SSL libraries, I ran
into a problem. It looks like some versions of the Cert
I do agree that the Citadel side is straightforward. The only area I will
need to research involves Apache mod_svn. Based on my limited knowledge of
the Apache API, it gets iffy at the point of passing the level of access the
user has - i.e. read only or read/write back to the SVN module. If we are
I see what you are suggesting. This should definitely be possible by reading
the request location and doing a comparison. I'll need to double check to see
how we can pass the R/W vs. Read Only status back to the AAA state in Apache.
- Stu
>Thu Mar 06 2008 05:53:59 PM EST from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>S
Hi -
That's a fantastic idea! As soon as I get the SSL implemented, I will add
that in. It wouldn't be hard to implement; we could simply see if the user
has permissions for the room based on the Apache config. Since the Apache
config can be limited to specific directories or locations, no additio
Excellent point... Always a good idea to follow protocol conventions :)
On a related note, I also forgot to include configuration information:
To activate the module, include the following in your main apache config:
LoadModule authn_citadel_module /usr/local/lib/libmod_authn_citadel.so
(change
Hi -Interesting you mention that... My system suffered a really odd data corruption problem after upgrading to 7.30.We're a fairly small system (only around ~1 gigabytes worth of mail in the DB at any given time), supporting a small business as well as my own personal email .. The bug exhibited i
47 matches
Mail list logo
