Sa Dez 19 2009 19:05:37 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70 release
Sat Dec 19 2009 04:57:29 AM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: 7.70 release
Fr Dez 18 2009 15:52:16 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70 release
Hang on are you using SVN or GIT?
Or are you saying tha
> Sat Dec 19 2009 04:57:29 AM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject:
>7.70 release
>
>
>
>
>> Fr Dez 18 2009 15:52:16 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70
>>release
>>
>> Hang on are you using SVN or GIT?
>>
>>Or are you saying that GIT can pull from an SVN and push back
> Fri Dec 18 2009 02:43:06 PM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject:
>7.70 release
>
>
>
>
>> Fr Dez 18 2009 14:16:11 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70
>>release
>>
>>
>>
>>I've lloked at it too, even read some articles and how-to's.
>>
>>At first glance its quite
> Fri Dec 18 2009 02:03:32 PM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject:
>7.70 release
>
>
>
> Git uses UIDs instead of counting up a number; Which makes a source
>commit over several branches uniq.
>
>Git also knows to pull over changes from other branches in a relative smart
>way; s
> Thu Dec 17 2009 09:28:59 PM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject:
>7.70 release
>
>
>
>
>> Do Dez 17 2009 14:58:43 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70
>>release
>>
>>
>>
>>We can each have a branch to work on different features and are each
>>responsible for keeping
Do Dez 17 2009 14:58:43 EST von davew @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70 release
We can each have a branch to work on different features and are each responsible for keeping our branch in line with TRUNK HEAD
Merging development branches together becomes a nightmare for the last person to merge in
> Thu Dec 17 2009 10:15:11 AM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
>Subject: 7.70 release
>
>
>
>Yes, we should continue to make use of release branches. I just don't want
>them to live *too* long. We'll keep stable-77x around for backports of bug
>fixes if that's the release that
Yes, we should continue to make use of release branches. I just don't want them to live *too* long. We'll keep stable-77x around for backports of bug fixes if that's the release that makes it into Debian stable, of course.
I think what I'm trying to say here is that we should never let svn head
Mi Dez 16 2009 22:46:16 EST von IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Betreff: 7.70 release
Uncensored is now running on the stable-77x branch. Assuming everything still looks good tomorrow morning, I will push this branch out to Easy Install and build some tarballs too.
I don't want this to be
Uncensored is now running on the stable-77x branch. Assuming everything still looks good tomorrow morning, I will push this branch out to Easy Install and build some tarballs too.
I don't want this to be a long-lived branch for anything other than Debian stable. The last time we lived too long
I'm good with that.
> Tue Dec 15 2009 02:57:32 PM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject:
>7.70 release
>
>
>
>I'd like us to have a 7.70 release _now_ from the following revisions:
>
>libcitadel r8087 | dothebart | 2009-11-26 21:41:02 +0100 (Do, 26. Nov 2009)
>| 2 Zeilen
>which would
I'd like us to have a 7.70 release _now_ from the following revisions:
libcitadel r8087 | dothebart | 2009-11-26 21:41:02 +0100 (Do, 26. Nov 2009) | 2 Zeilenwhich would be the last in advance of the addition of the delete feature to hash which isn't tested yet.
Webcit SVN Head; it contains lots o
12 matches
Mail list logo
