[Citadel Development] Re: 303 Status response

2011-01-21 Thread dothebart
hm, it pro'lly would also straightn the code and reduce unneccesary cross-dependencies.. it should probably be 302 for 'temporarily moved' else one won't be able to post a second message ;-) Fr Jan 21 2011 04:32:36 EST von samjam @ Uncensored Betreff: 303 Status response W3C seem to have

[Citadel Development] Re: 303 Status response

2011-01-21 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
This would work quite nicely with my current efforts to remove all of the round-trip form submissions in the system. For example, in the message editor, we no longer submit the form when adding attachments. It is my intention to validate recipients before sending the form as well. And in the