Ta.
You know, it seems vastly overkill to have to have a complete new .po file for
a language which is mostly compatible with en_US... isn't there any better
way of doing it? (Disclaimer: I know nothing about .po files, which was why I
included the diff.)
Quick poll for those of you who are copyright holders of any portion of
the Citadel system:
Do you have an opinion regarding GPLv2 vs. GPLv3 at this point? I
noticed that the Linux kernel appears to be destined to stay on GPLv2.
The alternative is of course the any later version
Any changes that would affect the ability to combine GPL, LGPL, and MIT
licensed code in the same package? We currently do that with WebCit, due
to the need to include three third-party JavaScript libraries. So far,
I've taken an attitude of STFU RMS, it's a bundle, not linked code
attitude.
There has never been a problem with linking GPL, LGPL, and MIT code.
I must be thinking of something else then. Apache license maybe?
maybe. the old style BSD license was always supposed to be a problem.
In other news, the Notes view in WebCit is no longer useless. You can
now click on a note to edit it, and the Add new note button now inserts
a new note directly into the page. Both operations are done ajax-style
without reloading the page.
