Isn't libcitadel going to be part of the full citadel distro? Rather,
will it be rolled into the citadel trunk?
r5906 | dothebart | 2007-12-30 09:18:06 -0500 (Sun, 30 Dec 2007) | 3 lines
Changed paths:
M /trunk/citadel/buildpackages
M /trunk/citadel/modules/dspam/serv_dspam.c
* disable dspam
* some package tweaks.
dothebart: please do a fresh checkout of webcit and try to build it. I
think there are still some missing #define's in there. After that, please
see whether you have the timezone bug too.
I'll eventually go in and start regressing both libical and webcit until
we figure out what
Thanks.
As I'm not a developer, I'm afraid that I won't be much use in helping
with the algorithm...though, as such, I wasn't questioning the algorithm.
I was really just curious as to how the numbers were reached, as the
system load average was actually around 1.0x to 1.5x, and wanted
r5907 | ajc | 2007-12-31 00:37:16 -0500 (Mon, 31 Dec 2007) | 4 lines
Changed paths:
M /trunk/webcit/context_loop.c
M /trunk/webcit/ical_dezonify.c
M /trunk/webcit/roomops.c
* Cleaned up some misc comments
*
