Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-16 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 5-10-2011 1:29, Colin Finck schreef: I have now reverted everything back to the RBuild scripts. Will set up a side-by-side solution with manual CMake builds as soon as possible - unless somebody solves all problems in the meantime :) If I recall correctly Timo recently managed to fix a

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-04 Thread caemyr
Without knowing the cause such upgrade is dangerous as new regressions might occur. Did you Colin try to enable freeldr debugging? På Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:05 AM, skrev Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl: Op 4-10-2011 2:53, Colin Finck schreef: Unfortunately, the CMake builds don't boot under

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-04 Thread Cameron Gutman
On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:06 AM, cae...@myopera.com wrote: I could also add intl.cpl not working in 2nd stage setup. Still, those regressions, apart from the KVM one are meaningless, compared to the profits CMake brings. Changing build system/buildchain is ALWAYS dramatic and troublesome. We

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-04 Thread Pierre Schweitzer
I've just run the said test. As you can see, no real difference: http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3831/debugdiablo.png Le mardi 04 octobre 2011 à 18:53 +0200, Pierre Schweitzer a écrit : Hi, Le mardi 04 octobre 2011 à 18:49 +0200, Bernd Blaauw a écrit : Did that test machine also choke on

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-04 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 4-10-2011 22:14, Pierre Schweitzer schreef: I've just run the said test. As you can see, no real difference: http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3831/debugdiablo.png Did that test machine also choke on a ISO generated by Windows Cmake, or only on the Linux Cmake generated ISO? This test

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-04 Thread Colin Finck
Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote: Could you provide any instructions to reproduce this issue please? Software versions, etc. Our buildslave uses KVM under Ubuntu 10.04. The underlying QEMU version is given as 0.12.3 with SeaBIOS 0.5.1. - Colin

[ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-03 Thread Colin Finck
Hello all, The Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave has been migrated to RosBE-Unix 2.0-RC1. All builds starting with r53983 are now created using a CMake environment. Unfortunately, the CMake builds don't boot under KVM on the same machine, but apparently for everybody else. To give you an

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-03 Thread caemyr
Unfortunately, i cannot replicate that. Tried this iso in vbox and qemu - all works well. Any chance that KVM is screwed? On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 2:53 AM, Colin Finck co...@reactos.org wrote: Hello all, The Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave has been migrated to RosBE-Unix 2.0-RC1. All

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

2011-10-03 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 4-10-2011 2:53, Colin Finck schreef: Unfortunately, the CMake builds don't boot under KVM on the same machine, but apparently for everybody else. To give you an idea what I mean by don't boot: http://img830.imageshack.us/img830/5145/image1iz.png If nobody has an idea how to debug or fix