Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] 02/08: [NTOSKRNL] Forbid processes without the Tcb prvilege to perform a user-mode hard-error BSOD.

2018-04-02 Thread Alex Ionescu
So to be clear, while the kernel still has tons of incompatible code and issues to barely run as a Win2003-compatible kernel, whenever there's an NT design decision you disagree with, you're going to be rewriting the little bit of code that _does work well_ to work contrary to how NT works? Did I

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] 02/08: [NTOSKRNL] Forbid processes without the Tcb prvilege to perform a user-mode hard-error BSOD.

2018-04-02 Thread Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO
Yes, to only allow programs that REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY ….. need to do so to trigger the hard-error “shutdown” BSOD from user-mode to do so, and these programs would better be only those that run only in SYSTEM rights, and more exactly these include CSRSS, WINLOGON and SMSS when something

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] 02/08: [NTOSKRNL] Forbid processes without the Tcb prvilege to perform a user-mode hard-error BSOD.

2018-04-02 Thread M. Ziggyesque
While this has application in protecting a system from rogue or trojan apps, supposedly a shutdown privilege would be something granted manually by a SYSTEM level process that is trusted, so that if the system is not recoverable a graceful shutdown can be attempted with minimal process

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] 02/08: [NTOSKRNL] Forbid processes without the Tcb prvilege to perform a user-mode hard-error BSOD.

2018-04-01 Thread Alex Ionescu
Is there a point to this blatant behavior change? Best regards, Alex Ionescu On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Hermès Bélusca-Maïto < hermes.belusca-ma...@reactos.org> wrote: > https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=commitdiff;h= > f0729b30bb79d6f538cf2b9578ff8ebe7989f8d3 > > commit