Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tfaber] 69296: [KMTESTS] - Add missing OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE - OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE in user mode has no effect... no reason to make a define around it CORE-10207

2015-09-23 Thread Thomas Faber
Oh? I'll need to add a test for that then, thanks. What does Windows's RTL do, then? I know in XP/2003 it might just hand out user handles, but e.g. on Win7 that would cause verifier to bugcheck. On 2015-09-20 20:51, Alex Ionescu wrote: Actually, in XP, OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE Did work, and gave

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tfaber] 69296: [KMTESTS] - Add missing OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE - OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE in user mode has no effect... no reason to make a define around it CORE-10207

2015-09-20 Thread Alex Ionescu
Actually, in XP, OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE Did work, and gave you a kernel handle that you could never use. In Windows Vista, it returns a failure code. Not sure about 2003. Best regards, Alex Ionescu On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:46 PM, wrote: > Author: tfaber > Date: Sat Sep 19