[ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread breakoutbox
Hello, [NTOS]: 1MB is not 1000 * 1KB... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte 1 KB = 1000 byte (decimal) 1 KiB = 1024 byte (binary) 1 MB = 1000 KB 1 MiB = 1024 KiB Would be nice if ReactOS goes across the border and also uses the modern SI unit definitions ;-) If in code definitions or

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread Daniel Reimer
WIndows uses internally the classic Definitions of MB and KB and we should do so, too. If you want it called MiB and KiB then its a GUI thing, nothing internal. Am 18.04.2010 12:10, schrieb breakoutbox: Hello, [NTOS]: 1MB is not 1000 * 1KB... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte 1 KB =

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread breakoutbox
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daniel Reimer daniel.rei...@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de Gesendet: 18.04.2010 12:46:51 An: ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Betreff: Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h WIndows uses internally

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread Olaf Siejka
Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Betreff: Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h WIndows uses internally the classic Definitions of MB and KB and we should do so, too. If you want it called MiB and KiB then its a GUI thing, nothing internal. Well

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread breakoutbox
Olaf Siejka schrieb: Mainly for compatibility reasons. If Windows does it that way, so would do Windows apps and drivers, depending on it. If we change this default behaviour, even with introducing some kind of aliases for the previous one, we risk breakage, that would could be hard to

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread Olaf Siejka
I am talking in general, about attempts to correct Microsoft. 2010/4/18 breakoutbox breakout...@web.de Olaf Siejka schrieb: Mainly for compatibility reasons. If Windows does it that way, so would do Windows apps and drivers, depending on it. If we change this default behaviour, even with

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread Andrew Faulds
I don't think Microsoft was wrong, I think Hard Disk manufacturers have tried to make them wrong in this case. On 18 April 2010 20:58, Olaf Siejka cae...@gmail.com wrote: I am talking in general, about attempts to correct Microsoft. 2010/4/18 breakoutbox breakout...@web.de Olaf Siejka

Re: [ros-dev] Commit by sir_richard :: r46904 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/miarm.h

2010-04-18 Thread ShadowFlare
Both sides have their own historical reasons for keeping things the way they are. On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Faulds ajf...@googlemail.comwrote: I don't think Microsoft was wrong, I think Hard Disk manufacturers have tried to make them wrong in this case. On 18 April 2010 20:58,