Re: [RDBO] helper function request

2007-01-11 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:54 PM, John Siracusa wrote: > > If so, let's go with "Debug" instead of "Debugging". I picked > "Debugging" > before because I didn't want any confusion with the various $Debug > package > variables, but if everything's going to be in ::Debug::*, then > that's not an >

Re: [RDBO] helper function request

2007-01-11 Thread John Siracusa
On 1/11/07 3:49 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > i'm going to structure it like this: > > Rose::DB::Object::Debugging base namespace (empty) > Rose::DB::Object::Debugging::Helpers mixin objects for debugging If so, let's go with "Debug" instead of "Debugging". I picked "Debugging" before beca

Re: [RDBO] helper function request

2007-01-11 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:13 PM, John Siracusa wrote: > Helpers are pretty wide-open, so don't ask, just write it :) If it > really > is solely for debugging, however, I think a > Rose::DB::Object::Debugging > module would a nice. It'd be the same thing as Helpers (import > methods > under op

Re: [RDBO] helper function request

2007-01-11 Thread John Siracusa
On 1/11/07 3:04 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > first off- i'd be willing to write this one. Helpers are pretty wide-open, so don't ask, just write it :) If it really is solely for debugging, however, I think a Rose::DB::Object::Debugging module would a nice. It'd be the same thing as Helpers (imp

[RDBO] helper function request

2007-01-11 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
first off- i'd be willing to write this one. i'd like to see something like this for debugging: $rodbObject->status(); that outputs: === This object IS in synch with the last known DB version | This object IS NOT in synch with the last DB version fieldname | object_value |

Re: [RDBO] insignificant error/behaviour found

2007-01-11 Thread John Siracusa
On 1/11/07 2:16 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:03 PM, John Siracusa wrote: >> I believe this is a DBI/DBD::Pg/libpg issue/reality/"feature" :) If you >> use DBI's prepare_cache() method and you change the db schema between calls, >> the previously-cached version of the cach

Re: [RDBO] insignificant error/behaviour found

2007-01-11 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:03 PM, John Siracusa wrote: > I believe this is a DBI/DBD::Pg/libpg issue/reality/"feature" :) > If you > use DBI's prepare_cache() method and you change the db schema > between calls, > the previously-cached version of the cached statement will become > invalid. > I

Re: [RDBO] insignificant error/behaviour found

2007-01-11 Thread John Siracusa
On 1/11/07 1:39 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > if i change a table columns definition during testing, I'll get > these errors: > > DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: prepared statement "dbdpg_17" > does not exist I believe this is a DBI/DBD::Pg/libpg issue/reality/"feature" :) If you use DBI's

[RDBO] insignificant error/behaviour found

2007-01-11 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
Runnin ModPerl2 w/ Apache Restart + Apache DBI + Postgres, I found this: if i change a table columns definition during testing, I'll get these errors: DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: prepared statement "dbdpg_17" does not exist and to note, on every cha