On Feb 17, 2008 3:36 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, but as I've said I'm not really a fan of runtime parameter
> validation.
I'm a horrible typist which makes me a big fan.
Doing it in just one place may have a minimal impact, but
> then the question becomes, why isn't it
On Feb 17, 2008 1:57 PM, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008 4:56 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Added the forget_related() helper method.
>
> This wasn't added to the :all export set in Rose::DB::Object:::Helpers.
> Intentional?
No, just an oversight (th
On Feb 17, 2008 2:04 PM, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Params::Validate is pretty fast, in my experience. Could I win you over
> with a patch and some benchmarks showing no significant performance
> degradation?
Maybe, but as I've said I'm not really a fan of runtime parameter
validatio
On Feb 14, 2008 8:04 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Perl 5 doesn't have any language features for validating named
> parameters, and doing so "manually" at runtime is (relatively)
> expensive. This is especially true for Manager methods which take a
> ton of parameters (and stil
On Feb 15, 2008 4:56 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Added the forget_related() helper method.
This wasn't added to the :all export set in Rose::DB::Object:::Helpers.
Intentional?
-sam
-
This SF.net emai
