Peter Karman wrote:
On 10/23/2007 11:29 AM, Bill Moseley wrote:
lib/My/Thing.pm
lib/My/Thing/Form.pm
Is that one form for each table kind of mapping?
I might have multiple forms for each table (or groups to tables) and
they are more related to the specific request (update user profile
Bill Moseley wrote:
[snip]
Yep, although I prefer to use English as the key to the language files
instead of an ID. Easier to understand when looking at specific
validation code. I can also fall back to using the ID (the English
error message) if the lookup fails in the language file.
Bill Moseley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:12:08PM -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Bill Moseley wrote:
[snip]
Yep, although I prefer to use English as the key to the language files
instead of an ID. Easier to understand when looking at specific
validation code. I can also fall back
James Masters wrote:
That is a suggestion of experience, thanks. I've analysed just done this
and the results are not what you ( I) probably expected.
I've tried all 4 combinations of server against mysql server. Numbers =
secs.
ServerMysql ServerDBI Rose
Old
Jeff Chimene wrote:
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
Try installing Scalar::Util by hand, or from a CPAN shell -- that
module and a few others don't seem to like being installed as
dependencies by many modules.
few perl modules make it to debian packages, fewer are timely. debian
was notorious
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 3/16/07, James Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering - does Rose deal with transactions, rollbacks etc. under the
hood (or under the bonnet as we say in England) and is therefore ACID
compliant?
You really don't need any help from your object-relational
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 3/16/07, Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Totally a side tangent, but when you start using your schema classes
from RDBO/DBIC/CDBI in things like Catalyst as Models, and maybe using
many of them at the same time in one transaction, that whole Just use
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 3/16/07, Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is, there's no sane way to do a big jumble of code in one DB
transaction without having to go code diving for a dbh to work against,
ala 'local $dbh-{AutoCommit} and such.
So you're saying that one
I guess I'm just spoiled by other languages sometimes. A certain MS Java
ripoff language can do transactions over an entire 'app domain'.
So any db call, to any db, multiple dbs, and file actions, or anything
that supports transactions act as part of one global transaction
automatically, without
parameters beyond just type and
domain are passed. (Suggested by Christopher H. Laco)
* Fixed a bug that prevented foreign keys with columns that use
reserved words from being auto-initialized correctly.
(Reported by Clayton Scott)
* Improved DSN parsing.
Woohoo
John Siracusa wrote:
On 12/21/06, Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to put the svn version in my PREREQ. Any idea when this
version will make it to CPAN?
I wasn't planning on releasing until January, but I can release
Rose::DB earlier if you want. (Of course, I'm
Time to float this to list, rather than being a pita on IRC. :-)
I'm trying to work R::DB objects where I need to create objects with
their own values, rather than relying things predefined in the registry.
(people tell Handel what dsn to use with its schema, and Handel doesn't
know connection
Even more confusing to me is that if I just set a database name, it
doesn't even connect:
Rose::DB-register_db(
domain = 'handel',
type = 'default',
driver = 'SQLite'
);
my $db = Rose::DB-new(
domain = 'handel',
type = 'default',
database =
When deleting an object, one can pass the cascade option so it will
delete all child objects in a relationship. In my case, passing cascade
to the cart object, will delete the cart and all of it's related items:
$cart-delete(cascade = 1);
Is there a way to do this same thing when delete
John Siracusa wrote:
On 12/15/06, Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When deleting an object, one can pass the cascade option so it will
delete all child objects in a relationship. In my case, passing cascade
to the cart object, will delete the cart and all of it's related items
John Siracusa wrote:
On 12/15/06, Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will cascade work if I load the carts with just their pk/fk columns, and
set with_objects to {} so they don't load the items?
I think you mean [], not {} (actually, it'd be better to just omit the
with_objects
If you want to do ad-hoc queries with filters, either use the Manager
directly, or create your own object methods that wrap the appropriate
manager calls:
package Cart;
...
sub get_items
{
my($self, %args) = @_;
# Clause that links items to this cart
17 matches
Mail list logo
