On 7/28/06, Danial Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found a bug a couple weeks back where I had a DB structure that had
> this odd table hanging around where the only field was the primary
> key, which was also a foreign key. I found at the time that you could
> create a new() on that object,
>> I found a bug a couple weeks back where I had a DB structure that had
>> this odd table hanging around where the only field was the primary
>> key, which was also a foreign key. I found at the time that you could
>> create a new() on that object, which would save() fine. But if you
>> ever wante
On 7/28/06 9:59 AM, Danial Pearce wrote:
> I found a bug a couple weeks back where I had a DB structure that had
> this odd table hanging around where the only field was the primary
> key, which was also a foreign key. I found at the time that you could
> create a new() on that object, which would
I found a bug a couple weeks back where I had a DB structure that had
this odd table hanging around where the only field was the primary
key, which was also a foreign key. I found at the time that you could
create a new() on that object, which would save() fine. But if you
ever wanted to ca
