Hi John et al,
This is all working wonderfully. But now I want to do a similar thing with
an individual record for which I know the primary key value. I assume it's
quickest/best to use Rose::DB::Object rather than Manager in this case. But
I can't see in the documentation how to specify the
On 10/20/06 2:37 AM, James Masters wrote:
This is all working wonderfully. But now I want to do a similar thing with
an individual record for which I know the primary key value. I assume it's
quickest/best to use Rose::DB::Object rather than Manager in this case. But
I can't see in the
Thanks again. I'm used to much less concise code - it's almost too easy!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John
Siracusa
Sent: 20 October 2006 13:40
To: Rose-DB-Object
Subject: Re: [RDBO] Elegant way to generically query a table
On Oct 20, 2006, at 5:39 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
[...]
If you know the class name already, just do this:
$record = $class-new(primarykeyfieldname = $pk)-load;
We (well, Graham) made the following manager class that gives us
fetch and fetch_or_create methods to shorten the
On 10/20/06 3:05 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
We (well, Graham) made the following manager class that gives us
fetch and fetch_or_create methods to shorten the -new(...)-load
stuff and to factor out the speculative option logic.
On the object side of things (as opposed to the Manager) keep min
On Oct 14, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
I think they key piece of knowledge you're missing is that a call
like:
$objs = My::Whatever::Manager-get_whatevers(...);
is exactly equivalent to:
$objs = Rose::DB::Object::Manager-get_objects(
object_class =
On 10/15/06 3:07 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Oct 14, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
I think they key piece of knowledge you're missing is that a call
like:
$objs = My::Whatever::Manager-get_whatevers(...);
is exactly equivalent to:
$objs =
I'm trying to write generic code that will work for any table. The
following does work but it's ugly. (I'm still just prototyping so please
excuse the nofrills output format). I suspect I'm labouring under all sorts
of naive misunderstandings. Does anyone know ways to improve this? In
