On Feb 17, 2008 3:36 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, but as I've said I'm not really a fan of runtime parameter
> validation.
I'm a horrible typist which makes me a big fan.
Doing it in just one place may have a minimal impact, but
> then the question becomes, why isn't it
On Feb 17, 2008 2:04 PM, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Params::Validate is pretty fast, in my experience. Could I win you over
> with a patch and some benchmarks showing no significant performance
> degradation?
Maybe, but as I've said I'm not really a fan of runtime parameter
validatio
On Feb 14, 2008 8:04 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Perl 5 doesn't have any language features for validating named
> parameters, and doing so "manually" at runtime is (relatively)
> expensive. This is especially true for Manager methods which take a
> ton of parameters (and stil
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all. I'm working on adjusting to Rose from a long history with CDBI, so
> I do this kind of thing a lot:
>
> $foos = My::Foo::Manager->get_foos(bar => "big");
>
> When I really mean:
>
> $foos = My::Foo::Manager->get_
Hey all. I'm working on adjusting to Rose from a long history with CDBI, so
I do this kind of thing a lot:
$foos = My::Foo::Manager->get_foos(bar => "big");
When I really mean:
$foos = My::Foo::Manager->get_foos(query => [bar => "big"]);
This is a nasty bug since the first incorrect call d
