I feel like I'm repeating work here -- I've got a similar set of
functions that serialize and restore trees of objects, only I'm doing
this in a very specific way, keeping only what I want from specific
classes (not reusable).
What are the chances of this object_tree code making it into 0.764 or
On 5/1/07, Derek Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel like I'm repeating work here -- I've got a similar set of
functions that serialize and restore trees of objects, only I'm doing
this in a very specific way, keeping only what I want from specific
classes (not reusable).
What are the
On May 1, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Derek Watson wrote:
I feel like I'm repeating work here -- I've got a similar set of
functions that serialize and restore trees of objects, only I'm doing
this in a very specific way, keeping only what I want from specific
classes (not reusable).
What are the
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:37 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
Even though there are a bunch of things on my short-term list that I
haven't gotten to, the change list is already quite large and I want
to cut a release soon (it will be 0.764). Is there any feature that I
previously mentioned I'd get to
