On 7/25/06, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are ALWAYS correct.
I'll be sure to pass that along to my wife ;)
> In one of my classes, I had set AutoCommit off for testing of some perl code,
> and I just happened to choose that class for an example and found the (now
> totally expected
I ran a test script containing your code:
---
package Spot::DB;
use strict;
use warnings;
use Rose::DB;
our @ISA = qw(Rose::DB);
Spot::DB->register_db(
domain=> 'development',
type => 'main',
driver=> 'Pg',
database => 'test',
username => 'postgres',
host =>
On 7/25/06 1:00 PM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/25/06, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a set of classes and am finding that I need to do an explicit commit
>> despite a Rose::DB subclass that is given below. Is this a normal behavior,
>> as from the docs,
On 7/25/06, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a set of classes and am finding that I need to do an explicit commit
> despite a Rose::DB subclass that is given below. Is this a normal behavior,
> as from the docs, it appears that the AutoCommit should default to 1 and
> even with it se
On 7/25/06 12:49 PM, "Sean Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a set of classes and am finding that I need to do an explicit commit
> despite a Rose::DB subclass that is given below. Is this a normal behavior,
> as from the docs, it appears that the AutoCommit should default to 1 and
>
