Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-28 Thread John Siracusa
On 10/28/05, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be possible to design a view class that would "be" a table if the > primary key was defined but otherwise be a generic View class? The more I think about it, the more trivial the view class seems. I mentioned before that it should die

Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-28 Thread Sean Davis
On 10/28/05 8:22 AM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/28/05 8:11 AM, Sean Davis wrote: >> Sorry. Re-reading, I did imply that it wasn't possible. What I meant was >> that one HAS to define the primary key explicitly > > Well, unless the convention manager can find it, of cours

Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-28 Thread John Siracusa
On 10/28/05 8:11 AM, Sean Davis wrote: > Sorry. Re-reading, I did imply that it wasn't possible. What I meant was > that one HAS to define the primary key explicitly Well, unless the convention manager can find it, of course :) > quite easy to do if there is such a primary key available (i.e.,

Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-28 Thread Sean Davis
On 10/28/05 8:03 AM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/28/05 6:31 AM, Sean Davis wrote: >> On 10/27/05 4:34 PM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 10/27/05, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there support for views in RDBO (as in views in the database ac

Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-28 Thread John Siracusa
On 10/28/05 6:31 AM, Sean Davis wrote: > On 10/27/05 4:34 PM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 10/27/05, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is there support for views in RDBO (as in views in the database acting as >>> tables, not as in "fake" views done in perl)? I don't see

Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-28 Thread Sean Davis
On 10/27/05 4:34 PM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/27/05, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there support for views in RDBO (as in views in the database acting as >> tables, not as in "fake" views done in perl)? I don't see any and was just >> curious if I was missi

Re: [RDBO] Support for views

2005-10-27 Thread John Siracusa
On 10/27/05, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there support for views in RDBO (as in views in the database acting as > tables, not as in "fake" views done in perl)? I don't see any and was just > curious if I was missing something. There's no explicit support, but you should be able to