I'm trying to write generic code that will work for any table. The
following does work but it's ugly. (I'm still just prototyping so please
excuse the nofrills output format). I suspect I'm labouring under all sorts
of naive misunderstandings. Does anyone know ways to improve this? In
particul
On Oct 13, 2006, at 16:11, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 10/13/06 7:03 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>> I keep making variations of this mistake,
>>
>> Model->delete_stuff
>> (where => [ foo_id => $l->id,
>> bar_id => [ keys %delete_bars ],
>>],
>> db
On 10/14/06 7:20 PM, James Masters wrote:
> I'm trying to write generic code that will work for any table. [...]
>
> # construct manager name
> my $classname = ucfirst($table);
> chop($classname);
> my $mgr = "GARD::".$classname."::Manager";
>
> # Note: I was hoping to do
> # use $mgr
> # at this
On 10/14/06 8:35 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> We are setting some other defaults with something like
>
>package My::DB::Object::Metadata::Base;
>use base qw(Rose::DB::Object::Metadata);
>
>sub new {
> shift->SUPER::new(
>default_update_changes_only => 1,
>default
On Oct 14, 2006, at 7:04 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
> Hm, I was thinking more along the lines of allow_empty_lists or
> something.
I like that. (Except if allowing it is the default, then "allow_*"
feels a little backwards).
- ask
--
http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/
-
