James Masters wrote:
Hi James
But if I choose the NOT NULL route, then surely I will still need a special
check i.e. if ($date ne '-00-00')
To me the latter sounds like a slighly more contrived check, no?
No. It's not that simple.
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/
But if I choose the NOT NULL route, then surely I will still need a special
check i.e. if ($date ne '-00-00')
RDBO uses DateTime to handle it's objects I believe. YMMV but I think
it may handle the -00-00 case under the hood.
regards,
Danial
On 3/15/07 6:14 AM, Danial Pearce wrote:
But if I choose the NOT NULL route, then surely I will still need a special
check i.e. if ($date ne '-00-00')
RDBO uses DateTime to handle it's objects I believe. YMMV but I think
it may handle the -00-00 case under the hood.
-00-00
On 3/15/07 9:14 AM, Peter Karman wrote:
The latest (0.09) CPAN version of this Catalyst plugin now contains support
for RDBO. You can specify a RDBO class name as the 'dbi_dbh' config param, and
it will return the dbh like:
My::RDBO::Session-new-dbh
Shouldn't that be this instead?
John Siracusa scribbled on 3/15/07 8:48 AM:
On 3/15/07 9:14 AM, Peter Karman wrote:
The latest (0.09) CPAN version of this Catalyst plugin now contains support
for RDBO. You can specify a RDBO class name as the 'dbi_dbh' config param,
and
it will return the dbh like:
