Re: [RDBO] unblessed reference due to relationship name clash with existing class

My apologies gentleman. I included a rather off the cuff analysis along with a rather terse description of the problematic behavior. So please ignore any prior remarks regarding the cause of the problem and here is the observed behavior using the classic Product and Price classes as examples:

[RDBO] epoch column type and 0 values

I'm using postgresql and storing my dates at ints. Latest CPAN releases of RDBO, Rose::DB and Rose::Object. I have a column defined like: complete => {type => 'epoch', default => '0', not_null => 1, time_zone => 'UTC'}, That works great until I load a record with complete = 0 and

Re: [RDBO] epoch column type and 0 values

On 6/28/07, Peter Karman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using postgresql and storing my dates at ints. Latest CPAN releases of > RDBO, > Rose::DB and Rose::Object. > > I have a column defined like: > > complete => > {type => 'epoch', default => '0', not_null => 1, time_zone => > 'UT