[RDBO] RDBO 0.7x to 1.0

2007-08-18 Thread John Siracusa
On 8/17/07 6:25 PM, Derek Watson wrote: > This is off-topic, but what lies ahead on the road between RDBO 0.7xx and > 1.0? Are there specific features you have in mind that will push us further > along, or is it just general maturity (eg. bug fixes and interface updates)? There are some specific f

Re: [RDBO] Still fighting with transactions

2007-08-18 Thread Graham Barr
On Aug 17, 2007, at 3:53 PM, John Siracusa wrote: >>> Finally, I suppose I could change the default implementation of >>> init_db() to be more like this instead: >>> >>> sub init_db { $DB ||= Rose::DB->new } >>> >>> But that'd be quite a behavior change, and it'd have its own set >>> of probl

[RDBO] persistent Rose::DB subclass [was: Still fighting with transactions]

2007-08-18 Thread Peter Karman
Graham Barr wrote on 8/18/07 8:13 AM: > On Aug 17, 2007, at 3:53 PM, John Siracusa wrote: Finally, I suppose I could change the default implementation of init_db() to be more like this instead: sub init_db { $DB ||= Rose::DB->new } But that'd be quite a behavior

Re: [RDBO] persistent Rose::DB subclass [was: Still fighting with transactions]

2007-08-18 Thread John Siracusa
On 8/18/07 11:56 PM, Peter Karman wrote: > Given that caching of database connections (either by caching Rose::DB objects > or the DBI objects they hold) is an oft-repeated thread on this list, and > given that John (quite rightly imo) doesn't want to put the caching behaviour > into Rose::DB, I wo