Re: [RDBO] persistent Rose::DB subclass [was: Still fighting with transactions]

2007-08-19 Thread Peter Karman
John Siracusa wrote on 8/18/07 11:25 PM: > On 8/18/07 11:56 PM, Peter Karman wrote: >> Given that caching of database connections (either by caching Rose::DB >> objects >> or the DBI objects they hold) is an oft-repeated thread on this list, and >> given that John (quite rightly imo) doesn't wan

Re: [RDBO] persistent Rose::DB subclass [was: Still fighting with transactions]

2007-08-19 Thread John Siracusa
On 8/19/07 11:34 AM, Peter Karman wrote: > John Siracusa wrote on 8/18/07 11:25 PM: >> Although I don't want this (caching, etc.) to be part of the behavior of >> Rose::DB->new(), I'm not opposed to making a new method called, say, >> Rose::DB->new_or_existing() or Rose::DB->new_or_cached(). > > n