big snip
Ok, so does Hibernate from the Java World, or JPA from Jave EE 3.0
actually do what we want? I suspect it does...
DSL
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From
On Nov 27, 2007 11:21 PM, David Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron Savage wrote:
You mean like SQL::Abstract?
http://search.cpan.org/~nwiger/SQL-Abstract-1.22/
I was thinking the same thing...does that not do what the OP wishes it to?
SQL::Abstract is very limited. It doesn't even handle
On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
You mean like SQL::Abstract?
No, definitely not like SQL::Abstract :) SQLA provides a very limited
set of features:
On Nov 27, 2007 9:29 AM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fwiw, the DBIC folks have been discussing this very topic lately:
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2007-November/005320.html
I know. I'm on that list too :)
-John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Perrin Harkins
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:19 PM
To: rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RDBO] suggestions for enchancement
On Nov 26, 2007 11:39 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL
On Nov 27, 2007 2:41 PM, maxim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its useful when you have XML based framework where your backend is
trying to reflect some XML schema and you dont what to remap XML on the DB
schema but just using it.
If you really want to use XML for your backend storage, I'd suggest
On Nov 27, 2007 3:19 PM, Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 2:41 PM, maxim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its useful when you have XML based framework where your backend is
trying to reflect some XML schema and you dont what to remap XML on the DB
schema but just using it.
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:29 PM, maxim wrote:
It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
Yeah, no kidding :) I've got ideas for one but so far not enough time
to dedicate to it.
Something like:
my $query = Rose::DB::TableName::Manager-getSelect();
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:29 PM, maxim wrote:
It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
Yeah, no kidding :) I've got ideas for one but so far not enough time to
dedicate to it.
Something like:
my $query = Rose::DB::TableName::Manager-getSelect();
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
Hi John
I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
You mean like SQL::Abstract?
http://search.cpan.org/~nwiger/SQL-Abstract-1.22/
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
10 matches
Mail list logo
