On 7 Dec 2007, at 16:41, Ken wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this exists already, but I needed a way to
serialize an
entire rose object tree into json. To do this, I created the below
methods in my base Rose::DB::Object class.
[snip]
column_values_as_json() in Rose::DB::Object::Helpers ?
Now that i've slept i'm wondering if the underlying problem might be
related to the way that defaults are handled in RDBO. That's one thing
that differs between the tables used in the original tests and the table
in the test i submitted.
Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With this patch,
On Dec 11, 2007 8:57 AM, Adam Prime [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that i've slept i'm wondering if the underlying problem might be
related to the way that defaults are handled in RDBO. That's one thing
that differs between the tables used in the original tests and the table
in the test i
Quoting John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you use the Loader to make these classes? MySQL tends to offer up
empty string default values for non-null character columns, and the
Loader dutifully reflects that, having no way to distinguish between
legitimate empty string default values that
On Dec 11, 2007 10:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will do. It might be worth noting in the loader documentation that
mysql does this, and how it affects loader, if it isn't already there
(it's entirely possible i missed it).
I added a brief gotchas section to the Loader docs in SVN.
-John
The undef_sets_null feature that alters the behavior of default
columns values will almost certainly go out in the next release (which
is coming soon). It may or may not be public (depending on if I have
time to do docs and add support for it to the rest of the column
types), but the code will be
Hi all,
I was wondering if load_on_demand and Oracle was working on .765?
I'm a newb of 24 hours, but I like what I see thus far! I'm just doing
some testing, and I can't seem to get lazy loading to work with our
Oracle db.
My test script works fine up until I change one blob column to use
On Dec 11, 2007 12:35 PM, Justin Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if load_on_demand and Oracle was working on .765?
Can you post a self-contained example script that reproduces the
problem? I don't have an Oracle database readily available to test
against, but lazy loading
Can you post a self-contained example script that reproduces the
problem?
No, it works fine when I try to put it in a self-contained script ;-)
Must be something I'm doing wrong in my subclasses. My bad, sorry for
the noise!
Justin
