Re: [RDBO] Too Many connections

2008-01-25 Thread maxim
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Siracusa Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:25 PM To: Rose-DB-Object Subject: Re: [RDBO] Too Many connections On 1/10/08 5:30 PM, James Masters wrote: Looking into this, I seem to simply be doing the following in a for loop more than 100

Re: [RDBO] Too Many connections

2008-01-11 Thread John Siracusa
On Jan 11, 2008 1:10 PM, Ted Zlatanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the automatic class builder should have a required option to set the default explicitly (it didn't, last time I looked). That would ensure the developer thought about it even in the path of least resistance. Wat would the

Re: [RDBO] Too Many connections

2008-01-11 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:43:23 -0500 John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS That's why I think the default unshared behavior is the safest in JS that sharing now requires some action (and therefore some thought) on JS the part of the developer. The required action is simple (usually a JS line

Re: [RDBO] Too Many connections

2008-01-11 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:29:43 -0500 John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JS On Jan 11, 2008 1:10 PM, Ted Zlatanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the automatic class builder should have a required option to set the default explicitly (it didn't, last time I looked). That would ensure the