Hello Tom,
I get this error when trying to build from svn:
make: *** No rule to make target `data/examples/logical-segments-2.rg',
needed by `data/data.cpp'. Stop.
make: *** No rule to make target `data/examples/logical-segments-3.rg',
needed by `data/data.cpp'. Stop.
I went ahead and
Hello Tom,
Looks like some kind of conflict was committed to the codebase for
src/gui/seqmanager/ChannelManager.h:
variant A
void insertChannelSetup(MappedEventList mC,
RosegardenDocument *doc,
Segment *s, RealTime start);
variant B
On Monday, January 30, 2012, Julie S wrote:
Looks like some kind of conflict was committed to the codebase for
src/gui/seqmanager/ChannelManager.h: variant A
I see the same here. Not even trying to work past that.
Right, I will commit a fresh copy.
I did commit a fix for the data.cpp
OK, a fresh commit is up. This ought to compile and work and include the
new example file in qrc.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online
I did commit a fix for the data.cpp problem. Apparently we never
automated
the process of picking up changes to the example files, so if you add or
remove anything, you have to run scripts/rebuild-qrc manually to get
everything back in sync.
I ran that, and here it finds no data due to not
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
So clearly that's something I need to watch out for and co-ordinate.
Michael, in the future, do I never remove a demo? Or is there something I
need to do?
I think that considering all the circumstances here, the simplest thing would
On 31 January 2012 19:52, D. Michael McIntyre
michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote:
I hate Git with a passion
I've developed a habit of recommending Mercurial for people with an
allergy to Git who would nevertheless like to use something more
modern than Subversion -- and some Git users
In this case, if I read it right, the problem wasn't so much the
choice of version control system as the fact that two different ones
(any two) were in use? Or is the root problem just that we didn't
automate rebuilding the data bundle?
Well, several things happened, of different severity.
I think that considering all the circumstances here, the simplest thing
would
probably be to just pick one file, say logical-segments-4.rg or whatever
the
current version is, and just keep switching it out from there, rather than
working through a succession of logical-segments-n++.rg files.
Hello Tom,
May I suggest the radical solution of having both make-qrc-svn and a
make-qrc-git scripts.
You are not the only person who has used git for development in RG. If I'm
ever in the position to develop on RG again, I would probably have a local git
repository and sync with svn like
Hello Tom,
I got your new build and it compiled without a hitch here. Unfortunately, I
don't have the time tonight to give it a good run and provide feedback.
I look forward to trying it real soon.
Sincerely,
Julie S.
--- On Tue, 1/31/12, Julie S msjuli...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Julie S
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Chris Cannam wrote:
[Is the problem] the fact that two different ones (any two) were in use? Or
is the root problem just that we didn't automate rebuilding the data bundle?
Both, really.
If we add or remove data files, it's apparently necessary to run that script
12 matches
Mail list logo
