Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
[cc -devel] On 10 May 2012 13:41, Ian Gardner ilgard...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I guess people like me are part of the problem in this regard, turn up one day, chuck something in to do with linked segments and then f. off into the sunset. Fly-by-night, here today and gone tomorrow contributors

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Richard Bown
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could contribute to new website/direction/developments. Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some people who are big current contributors. This is just to get the ball rolling so apologies in

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Andy
Richard Bown wrote: Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could contribute to new website/direction/developments. Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some people who are big current contributors. This is just to get the ball

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Kickstarter

2012-05-10 Thread Ted Felix
On 5/8/2012 11:52 PM, Daren Beattie wrote: Does anyone have experience with smart pointers? shared_ptr works for me: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.htm http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr But I do try to avoid it by writing code that doesn't

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Thursday, May 10, 2012, Chris Cannam wrote: Well, you could say anyone who ever wrote any of the code is part of the problem by now! I know I am. Even I am, really. There's stuff I wrote from scratch so long ago, I don't quite remember how it works either. It's worse though when it's

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On 10 May 2012 19:32, D. Michael McIntyre michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com wrote: I think even worse than that is keeping the tests working over time.  We had some tests, but they didn't survive the port. But that's just another sign that they weren't terribly relevant unit tests. Even

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On 10 May 2012 16:18, Richard Bown richard.b...@ferventsoftware.com wrote: Devs or Interested in Ports I'm not particularly interested in a Mac port and don't especially want one, but I'm certainly competent to make one and would try to help out if there was more general interest. (Why not

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-10 Thread Clem, Brian T.
On 10 May 2012 16:18, Richard Bown richard.b...@ferventsoftware.com wrote: Devs or Interested in Ports I'm not particularly interested in a Mac port and don't especially want one, but I'm certainly competent to make one and would try to help out if there was more general interest. (Why not