On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:34 PM, david wrote:
> Abrolag wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:09:32 -1000
> > david wrote:
> >
> >> And here I think the Unity interface sucks, and much prefer XFCE. You
> >> might check out LXDE, it's light but a bit more polished than XFCE.
> >
> > Another possibili
Abrolag wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:09:32 -1000
> david wrote:
>
>> And here I think the Unity interface sucks, and much prefer XFCE. You
>> might check out LXDE, it's light but a bit more polished than XFCE.
>
> Another possibility is Openbox - Lightweight, very configurable, smart but not
LXDE is very nice and brisk. I have moved over to using that in Ubuntu
Studio 11.10
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:09:32 -1000
> david wrote:
>
> > And here I think the Unity interface sucks, and much prefer XFCE. You
> > might check out LXDE, it's light
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:09:32 -1000
david wrote:
> And here I think the Unity interface sucks, and much prefer XFCE. You
> might check out LXDE, it's light but a bit more polished than XFCE.
Another possibility is Openbox - Lightweight, very configurable, smart but not
full of eye candy.
--
Wi
And here I think the Unity interface sucks, and much prefer XFCE. You
might check out LXDE, it's light but a bit more polished than XFCE.
Frank wrote:
>I've been using ubuntustudio for some time with Rosegarden and not
> had to do anything much more than configure Jack. Mind you, the stuff I
I've been using
ubuntustudio for some time with Rosegarden and not had to do
anything much more than configure Jack. Mind you, the stuff I do
is pretty light weight.
I've also just downloaded and installed the latest 11.10 and man
am I getting frustra
D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Sunday, October 16, 2011, Ian Gardner wrote:
>
>> This is the first time I've experienced anything other than practically
>> useless rg/qsynth performance on a vanilla kernel (ubuntu version).
>
> Interesting.
>
> What will be really interesting to see is if this
