Hi Andrew,
On 06/09/2022 19:37, Andrew S wrote:
Hello, all.
[technical problems: This is my 5^th attempt to post this message. I
have two “screenshots”, in JPGs. Auto-reply tells me the size limit here
is 40K. You can’t send any meaningful image, especially TWO of them,
scaled down to under
Hello, all.
[technical problems: This is my 5th attempt to post this message. I have two “screenshots”, in JPGs. Auto-reply tells me the size limit here is 40K. You can’t send any meaningful image, especially TWO of them, scaled down to
On 03/09/2022 19:16, Ted Felix wrote:
On 9/2/22 7:26 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
I think it would make sense to be able to place controllers in a
non-continuous way on the (horizontal) time-scale depending on the
selected matrix Grid or quantization.
Snap to grid for the controller rulers.
On 9/2/22 7:26 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
I think it would make sense to be able to place controllers in a
non-continuous way on the (horizontal) time-scale depending on the
selected matrix Grid or quantization.
Snap to grid for the controller rulers. Sounds like a valid feature
request.
Has this ever been discussed?
I think it would make sense to be able to place controllers in a
non-continuous way on the (horizontal) time-scale depending on the
selected matrix Grid or quantization.
This would be useful e.g. for sustain controllers, exact panning, but
also more creative
