On 01/21/2016 12:01 PM, Todd Pierce wrote:
> I'll make sure to document the entire process so it's available to
> everybody when (arrogant confidence) I'm done. I'm going to schedule a
> couple of hours to cry in advance and then get started.
I'm the guy who tried the "zero downtime" installatio
On 01/21/2016 09:33 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> I ran Cakewalk for DOS on a 386, but we're talking about a midi only
> application. Are you talking about cakewalk with audio, VST (or
> whatever) synth plugins etc.?
I think it had extremely early and rudimentary audio support, but
nothing like VS
On 21/01/2016 12:59, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 06:57 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
>
>> It should be. However, rg is still somewhat wasteful of CPU, so it
>> might not work well. A MIDI sequencer should run fine at 900MHz on a
>> single core. I run CakeWalk on an old 1GHz machine
On 01/20/2016 06:57 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
> It should be. However, rg is still somewhat wasteful of CPU, so it
> might not work well. A MIDI sequencer should run fine at 900MHz on a
> single core. I run CakeWalk on an old 1GHz machine with no problems at
> all. Lots of CPU left over.
I ran
