On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:12:36 -0500 "D. Michael McIntyre" <rosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 04:32 PM, Abrolag wrote: > > > I thought I'd see if I could work anything out myself, but after 3-4 hours > > of > > looking over the code, I still didn't have any idea how all the bits link > > together :( > > I've never gotten anywhere with sequencer/audio stuff myself. > > > Is it possible to discover who wrote the original code, and maybe gently > > tweak > > their nose? Failing that, are there any other devs who might take a look at > > it? > > It was probably Richard Bown or Chris Cannam, neither of whom has been > active here in a number of years. Oh, shame :( > Did you ever file a bug report? Ted Felix will tackle just about > anything if there is enough interest, but he loses track of email > easily. He's basically the only guy I know with sufficient skill to > have a hope of getting into the head of the developers. That code uses > a million deprecated things anyway, and should probably be on the > schedule for a big cleanup. Yes. here: https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1491/ > It could also be argued we should just eliminate audio and synth plugins > entirely. Now that I've been using REAPER and the VST stuff on Windows, > I realize that there are dozens of missing features, like splitting > audio at the nearest zero crossing, crossfades, smooth management of > takes, and on and on. Personally I'd be rather unhappy if that was done. I've got about 40 files with mixed audio and MIDI tracks. > I can finally understand why Richard just ditched the audio features in > his Windows fork. We're not a lot more sophisticated than Audacity, but > we're a lot harder to get up and running than Audacity. Just the ability to playback an audio track at the same time as recording MIDI is incredibly useful > I could go either way on that one. If I had a usable mixer for my damn > audio interface so I could use it with Linux, I might not be above > adding some of those features and making our audio side useful. No > chance of that happening though. That mixer is complicated, my time is > extremely limited, etc. > > Anyway Will, I will definitely agree with you that looking at this crap > every time I close Rosegarden is getting on my nerves too: > > terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'Jack::JackTemporaryException' > what(): Well I shan't hold my breath, but just give a hopeful wave occasionally :) -- W J G ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
