Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-20 Thread Will Godfrey
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:21:57 -0400 "D. Michael McIntyre" wrote: >On 8/20/20 5:22 AM, Hugo van Galen wrote: >> I have successfully compiled Rosegarden with Jack2. I suspect that the >> dependency list is a bit outdated. > >I may have been the last person to touch the dependency list, and that

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On 8/20/20 5:22 AM, Hugo van Galen wrote: I have successfully compiled Rosegarden with Jack2. I suspect that the dependency list is a bit outdated. I may have been the last person to touch the dependency list, and that would have been several years ago. I can confirm that I build with jack2

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-20 Thread Hugo van Galen
I have successfully compiled Rosegarden with Jack2. I suspect that the dependency list is a bit outdated. As it appears you already have `libjack-jackd2-dev` installed, so skip this dependency for now and after installing other dependencies, try compiling the project again. Hope this helps. On

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-20 Thread liebrecht
Seems to be uninstallable on MX16. Using the dependency list supplied; Needs libjack-dev, but must install libjack0 However installing libjack0 breaks everything. e.g. The following packages will be REMOVED: bitwig-studio carla-bridge-win32 carla-bridge-wine32:i386 jackd jackd2

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-19 Thread david
Maybe here? http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/dev:contributing Under Prepare the Build Environment. On 8/19/20 6:59 AM, liebre...@grossmann-venter.com wrote: Also, where can I find the list of dependencies? They are not in the README. "As of 10.02 all formerly optional dependencies are now

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-19 Thread liebrecht
Also, where can I find the list of dependencies? They are not in the README. "As of 10.02 all formerly optional dependencies are now mandatory dependencies. We've taken this step because it is a real support hassle working through a set of problems to finally uncover the reason something has

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-19 Thread liebrecht
Running cmake without options results in: /home/redacted/Downloads/rosegarden/rosegarden-20.06/src/gui/rulers/PropertyControlRuler.cpp: In member function ‘void Rosegarden::PropertyControlRuler::updateSelection(std::vector*)’:

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-19 Thread liebrecht
That's fine. i understand but exactly this information should be in the README. 99% of users will do exactly what is in the README and not consider any other options as there is no way to know if the install will be broken or even worse positively failing without user knowledge. No general

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-19 Thread Hugo van Galen
If options are enclosed in [] brackets, that usually indicates these are optional. If you don't need them, you can omit them entirely, but if you need them, you would need to add them but without the [] brackets. So, if you do not want to build the debug version, then this would be enough:

[Rosegarden-user] Compiling Version 20

2020-08-19 Thread liebrecht
After I cd into the source directory, I follow the README. It says mkdir build cd build cmake .. [-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=[PREFIX]] [-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug] make make install Executing $] cmake .. [-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=[PREFIX]] [-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug] Iget: #