Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread Demonic Sweaters
Chiming in as well, There's a few points I've read in this list that I wanted to respond to. 1. nobody uses rosegarden for audio - I actually have, and do, several songs have even been released on some albums of mine recorded this way. Sure, it's not the most fully featured for audio, but

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread Will Godfrey
Just adding my take on the audio front. I frequently collaborate with people who send me audio guitar and/or vocal tracks. I load these into Rosegarden, then produce MIDI tracks to make my additions. On very rare occasion I'll do some processing of the audio with plugins in Rosegarden, but I

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread ram
Hi all, Just my two cents. We use Rosegarden regularly for the creation of video, game, and museum display, soundtracks. We don't use LV2 plugins, and very seldom use any plugins at all. I, personally, would prefer if Rosegarden interfaced better with Jack/MIDI and the like as most of the

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On 3/11/20 11:43 PM, Ted Felix wrote:   Just wondering why folks want LV2 support.  Not that I'll ever get to it, but some justification will help focus the effort.  Thanks. I've been ignoring the issue for quite a few years, but I spent some time today looking at what lv2 is, what plugins

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread ram
Yeah, I do something similar. I record the raw audio tracks with Rosegarden and then when I have all the tracks (and then some), I pull them into Audacity for editing, mixing, and processing. Outputs are usually stereo, 5.1, and 7.1 flac files to be merged with video. I use a Linux cluster and