Re: [Rosegarden-user] Fuzzy Quantisation

[Lorenzo Sutton]

On 24/05/20 11:19, Will Godfrey wrote:

Has anyone thought of this? 'Hard' quantisation tends to take the life out of
an otherwise mostly OK performance.

My guess is that you could apply something like a square law to the error
quantity so that notes that are furthest away would get the most adjustment.
Also, the ability to dial in the degree of correction being applied.

Possible?


Cool idea... What about groove quantize? :-)

Lorenzo



___
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Fuzzy Quantisation

[David W. Jones]

On May 23, 2020 11:19:18 PM HST, Will Godfrey  
wrote:
>Has anyone thought of this? 'Hard' quantisation tends to take the life
>out of
>an otherwise mostly OK performance.
>
>My guess is that you could apply something like a square law to the
>error
>quantity so that notes that are furthest away would get the most
>adjustment.
>Also, the ability to dial in the degree of correction being applied.
>
>Possible?

Sounds fantastically useful to me, too!


---
David W. Jones
gn...@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com

Sent from my Android device with F/LOSS K-9 Mail.


___
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user