Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-17 Thread david
On 3/15/20 9:38 PM, Will Godfrey wrote: On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:50:30 -1000 "David W. Jones" wrote: Hmm. How is polyphonic aftertouch different from regular aftertouch? Not that I have a keyboard that supports aftertouch, but someday I'll get one. It is per key. So if you are holding down a

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-16 Thread Richard Bown
This is a thread of golden feedback! Wonderful to see RG alive and kicking after all this time. I always thought JACK MIDI was the sensible way to go seeing as Ardour could then in theory effortlessly synchronise. But obviously it wasn't a simple integration - I would've looked at it more closely

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-16 Thread Will Godfrey
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:50:30 -1000 "David W. Jones" wrote: >Hmm. How is polyphonic aftertouch different from regular aftertouch? > >Not that I have a keyboard that supports aftertouch, but someday I'll get one. It is per key. So if you are holding down a chord then put extra pressure on one

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-15 Thread David W. Jones
Hmm. How is polyphonic aftertouch different from regular aftertouch? Not that I have a keyboard that supports aftertouch, but someday I'll get one. On March 15, 2020 9:50:31 AM HST, Will Godfrey wrote: >On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:06:27 -0400 >Ted Felix wrote: > >>On 3/12/20 3:25 AM, Will Godfrey

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-15 Thread Will Godfrey
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:06:27 -0400 Ted Felix wrote: >On 3/12/20 3:25 AM, Will Godfrey wrote: >> People want it so that they can use various effects and instrument plugins, >> some of which don't have stand-alone versions. > > Thanks, Will. > > BTW, have you been working with the latest

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-15 Thread david
On 3/14/20 9:26 PM, Will Godfrey wrote: On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 20:24:55 -1000 david wrote: I'm definitely not in the professional league! I use Rosegarden for making scores and recordings of those songs. I usually use the DSSI plugin to interface with fluidsynth. My experience with RG and

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-15 Thread Will Godfrey
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 20:24:55 -1000 david wrote: >I'm definitely not in the professional league! > >I use Rosegarden for making scores and recordings of those songs. I >usually use the DSSI plugin to interface with fluidsynth. > >My experience with RG and Yoshimi hasn't been good. Way too often,

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-15 Thread david
I'm definitely not in the professional league! I use Rosegarden for making scores and recordings of those songs. I usually use the DSSI plugin to interface with fluidsynth. My experience with RG and Yoshimi hasn't been good. Way too often, I get a voice/setup I want in Yoshimi, point RG at

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-14 Thread Will Godfrey
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:03:32 -0400 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: >On Saturday, March 14, 2020 04:31:42 AM Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >> Sorry for the long email, we are locked at home here in Italy and maybe >> more prone to techno-philosophical thoughts :D > >I hope you are reasonably comfortably

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-14 Thread rhkramer
On Saturday, March 14, 2020 04:31:42 AM Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > Sorry for the long email, we are locked at home here in Italy and maybe > more prone to techno-philosophical thoughts :D I hope you are reasonably comfortably locked in, stay safe, and get unlocked soon!

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-14 Thread Michael N. Moran
Greetings, In the spirit of use-cases, I'll chime-in. I'm an occasional/casual user of Rosegarden and have been for many years. I'm a very amateur guitar player and member of a church choir. My most common use-case is that of trying to learn a particular vocal part (e.g. tenor) by

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-14 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
Hi all, I think it's really interesting to learn about people's different workflows, especially in more professional settings like in this case. I guess it would also be nice to know what people might like in terms of more 'sequencer' related features. For me Rosegarden has always been

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread ram
Yeah, I do something similar. I record the raw audio tracks with Rosegarden and then when I have all the tracks (and then some), I pull them into Audacity for editing, mixing, and processing. Outputs are usually stereo, 5.1, and 7.1 flac files to be merged with video. I use a Linux cluster and

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread Will Godfrey
Just adding my take on the audio front. I frequently collaborate with people who send me audio guitar and/or vocal tracks. I load these into Rosegarden, then produce MIDI tracks to make my additions. On very rare occasion I'll do some processing of the audio with plugins in Rosegarden, but I

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread Demonic Sweaters
Chiming in as well, There's a few points I've read in this list that I wanted to respond to. 1. nobody uses rosegarden for audio - I actually have, and do, several songs have even been released on some albums of mine recorded this way. Sure, it's not the most fully featured for audio, but

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread ram
Hi all, Just my two cents. We use Rosegarden regularly for the creation of video, game, and museum display, soundtracks. We don't use LV2 plugins, and very seldom use any plugins at all. I, personally, would prefer if Rosegarden interfaced better with Jack/MIDI and the like as most of the

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On 3/11/20 11:43 PM, Ted Felix wrote:   Just wondering why folks want LV2 support.  Not that I'll ever get to it, but some justification will help focus the effort.  Thanks. I've been ignoring the issue for quite a few years, but I spent some time today looking at what lv2 is, what plugins

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-12 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 12/03/20 04:43, Ted Felix wrote:   Just wondering why folks want LV2 support.  Not that I'll ever get to it, but some justification will help focus the effort.  Thanks. Quick answer would be: upgrade DSSI/LADSPA support as LV2 is now the 'de facto' plugin standard on linux (and for most

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-12 Thread Ted Felix
On 3/12/20 3:25 AM, Will Godfrey wrote: People want it so that they can use various effects and instrument plugins, some of which don't have stand-alone versions. Thanks, Will. BTW, have you been working with the latest svn? Some recent changes might affect you. Hopefully you have time

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-12 Thread Will Godfrey
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:43:47 -0400 Ted Felix wrote: > Just wondering why folks want LV2 support. Not that I'll ever get to >it, but some justification will help focus the effort. Thanks. > >Ted. People want it so that they can use various effects and instrument plugins, some of which don't