RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-11 Thread Robert Huffman
. Thanks, Bob Huffman RealMed Corporation Indianapolis, Indiana -Original Message- From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Ron, while I don't

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-09 Thread Ronald Bowron
Rachel, You may recall that we had submitted definitions for ISA sender and ISA receiver that I thought were considered acceptable. The basic concept is that the sender is the entity responsible for creating the exchange and it's contents and the receiver is responsible to processing the

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-09 Thread Dave Minch
. Dave Minch TCS Project Manager John Muir / Mt. Diablo Health System Walnut Creek, CA (925) 941-2240 -Original Message- From: Ronald Bowron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Are only 15 characters

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-05 Thread Dave Minch
-2240 -Original Message- From: Christopher J. Feahr, OD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:48 PM To: Dave Minch; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave, Thanks for your detailed summary posts... very helpful! But I

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-05 Thread Dave Minch
... Dave Minch TCS Project Manager John Muir / Mt. Diablo Health System Walnut Creek, CA (925) 941-2240 -Original Message- From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:32 AM To: WEDi/SNIP ID Routing Subject: Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA

Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-04 Thread William J. Kammerer
: Tuesday, 02 April, 2002 09:36 PM Subject: RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? If I can sum up the last few days of discussion that I have just waded through: as a transaction sender I should be able to follow the workflow below, starting with the responsible party's insurance

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-04 Thread Rachel Foerster
-Original Message- From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:32 AM To: WEDi/SNIP ID Routing Subject: Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave: I took a look at my insurance card for Anthem Community Choice, and besides my

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-04 Thread Christopher J. Feahr, OD
Dave, Thanks for your detailed summary posts... very helpful! But I was under the impression that the ISA08 is always intended to be the ID of the next destination for the interchange, rather than the ID of the payor or plan (in the case of a claim), as you seem to be suggesting here. Am I

Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-03 Thread William J. Kammerer
04:26 PM Subject: Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Isn't the small size of these identifiers the main reason why we have to map the identifiers into an address? It is still trivial and reliable and cheap to do this using the currently existing DNS, using a small XML tag

Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-02 Thread William J. Kammerer
Now, as Rachel would say, I think I'm getting wrapped around an axle with this ISA and GS stuff. After thinking about it, the GS should only be used for internal routing by the recipient - something we all learned in EDI 101. No intermediary or communications package should ever have to drill

Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-02 Thread Christopher J. Feahr, OD
well... the small size of the ISA08 field, combined with the variety of application-specific addressing requirements, and the general reluctance to require receivers to drill further in to ferret out more addressing clues... would certainly seem to MANDATE the existence of one or more

Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-02 Thread Kepa Zubeldia
Isn't the small size of these identifiers the main reason why we have to map the identifiers into an address? It is still trivial and reliable and cheap to do this using the currently existing DNS, using a small XML tag in the TXT component of the DNS directory, just like William has his

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-02 Thread David Frenkel
: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:24 AM To: WEDi/SNIP ID Routing Subject: Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Now, as Rachel would say, I think I'm getting wrapped around an axle with this ISA and GS stuff. After thinking about

RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough?

2002-04-02 Thread Dave Minch
:27 PM To: Christopher J. Feahr, OD; William J. Kammerer; WEDi/SNIP ID Routing Subject: Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Isn't the small size of these identifiers the main reason why we have to map the identifiers into an address? It is still trivial and reliable