>>> I know my employer uses the rr.ntt.net instance on a daily basis.
>> yes, i built that and heas has done cool stuff. does your employer
>> register in ARIN or APNIC irr? < light goes on?>
> We encourage anyone to register their routes in the appropiate IRR,
> especially when that IRR offers
> The following RIR IRR's are in use today: RIPE, APNIC, AfriNIC, ARIN.
most operators in X do not register routes in irrX for all X except RIPE
> I do not agree with "most rir irr instances are unused".
cool. maybe you could back your disagreement up with measurement.
randy
>>> The following RIR IRR's are in use today: RIPE, APNIC, AfriNIC, ARIN.
>> most operators in X do not register routes in irrX for all X except RIPE
> Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here.
most folk in non-ripe regions do not use their rir's irr instance.
> I know my employer uses
Hi All,
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:55:40PM +0100, denis wrote:
> I don't claim this will solve all the problems of the universe, but it
> does satisfy an immediate goal to have all ROUTE objects in the RIPE
> Database created with the knowledge and approval of the related
> resource holders.
Hi All
I raised an idea before the last RIPE Meeting but it did not generate a
lot of interest at that time. I brought it up again yesterday on the
Anti Abuse WG list and it seemed to get quite a bit of support. So I
will bring it back to the DB WG as it is a DB issue.
I have CC'ed both AA
> STEP 1
>
> Any ROUTE object submitted for creation in the RIPE Database involving
> an out of region resource (address space and/or ASN) where that out of
> region resource does not exist in the authoritative RIR database (has
> not been allocated or assigned), reject the creation.
>
> The
BGP Update Report
Interval: 29-Oct-15 -to- 05-Nov-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS262401 405321 6.9%7947.5 -- GSTN DO BRASIL LTDA,BR
2 - AS9829 282587 4.8%