Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-31 Thread Andrew Evers
> While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? > > Please vote on the following release plans as follows: > > +1 = In favor > 0 = Don't care > -1 = Against it > > Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. > > > Plan 1: >

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Martin Poeschl
Ryan Hoegg wrote: While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? Please vote on the following release plans as follows: +1 = In favor 0 = Don't care -1 = Against it Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. Plan 1:

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Daniel Rall wrote: Is it the 1.2 branch which needs the base-64 fixes backported into it? I'm all for improving the performance, but I wouldn't hold up a release on account of it. Agreed, we need to put what we have into the 1.2 branch (once the voting is officially over). I will port the f

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Daniel Rall
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > Daniel Rall wrote: > > >p.s. Did the base-64 fixes make it into both 1.2 branch _and_ HEAD? > > Not yet. I think the issue is basically closed except for some > uncertainty on performance with large inputs. I was going to get around > to making a test

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Martin Redington
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 09:47 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote: Daniel Rall wrote: p.s. Did the base-64 fixes make it into both 1.2 branch _and_ HEAD? Not yet. I think the issue is basically closed except for some uncertainty on performance with large inputs. There's a new comment added to

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread John Wilson
quot;Ryan Hoegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:11 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release plan > While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? > > Please vote on the following release plans as follows: > > +1 = In fa

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Daniel Rall wrote: p.s. Did the base-64 fixes make it into both 1.2 branch _and_ HEAD? Not yet. I think the issue is basically closed except for some uncertainty on performance with large inputs. I was going to get around to making a test for that this weekend. I found a tasty Project Gu

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Daniel Rall
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? > > Please vote on the following release plans as follows: > > +1 = In favor > 0 = Don't care > -1 = Against it > > Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. Any -1 votes must be acc

[VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? Please vote on the following release plans as follows: +1 = In favor 0 = Don't care -1 = Against it Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. Plan 1: Go forward with a 1.