Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel,
>
> On 2002.06.10 16:14 Daniel Rall wrote:
>
>> protected String getProperty(String name, String defaultValue)
>> {
>> try
>> {
>> return System.getProperty(name);
>> }
>> catch (SecurityException
Daniel,
On 2002.06.10 16:14 Daniel Rall wrote:
> protected String getProperty(String name, String defaultValue)
> {
> try
> {
> return System.getProperty(name);
> }
> catch (SecurityException useDefault)
> {
> return default
"John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jim Redman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Dictionary vs. Hashtable in XmlRpc.java
>
>
On 2002.06.08 07:50 John Wilson wrote:
>
> > System.getProperty
> >
> > also always throws and prints in IE so that causes more problems in
> > applets.
>
> Jim,
>
> Would explicitly catching the exception help?
I'm working from memory, but my recollection is that it prints an
exception
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Redman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: Dictionary vs. Hashtable in XmlRpc.java
> System.getProperty
>
> also always throws and prints in IE so that causes m
, June 07, 2002 1:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Dictionary vs. Hashtable in XmlRpc.java
>
>
> [snip]
>
> > Yeah, we can drop it if anyone wants to submit a patch. I'm still a
> > bit unsure about how this will affect use from applets, but as a 1.2
> > plug-in is a
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: Dictionary vs. Hashtable in XmlRpc.java
[snip]
> Yeah, we can drop it if anyone wants to submit a patch. I'm still a
&g
The jar is also 250K. After we've hit our application with the Ant
"GenJar" task, that's about the size of the typical application - so
it would double the download time.
The license didn't seem to specifically limit pulling out certain
classes but I wouldn't want to be the final judge of wh
Tim Peierls wrote:
> > There is a 1.1 collections compatibility jar from Sun. Would
> > that do the trick for your 1.1 user base?
Jim Redman wrote:
> I can't find the jar to download, nor the license, but in priciple I
> have no objections. ... And I'm definitly not opposed to performance
> impro
Tim,
On 2002.06.06 20:38 Tim Peierls wrote:
>
> There is a 1.1 collections compatibility jar from Sun. Would
> that do the trick for your 1.1 user base?
>
I can't find the jar to download, nor the license, but in priciple I
have no objections. I didn't know the jar existed - we may have use
Jim Redman wrote:
> I'd be opposed to any changes that require Java2. I'm also not sure
> why the change is proposed. Is there some pressing reason to drop the
> Hashtable?
Hashtable and Vector are concrete classes, not interfaces.
As of JDK 1.2 they are synchronized implementations of the
Map a
We still have a bunch of customers using raw IE and Netscape 4.x. So
I'd be opposed to any changes that require Java2. I'm also not sure
why the change is proposed. Is there some pressing reason to drop the
Hashtable?
Jim
On 2002.06.06 18:54 Daniel Rall wrote:
> Tim Peierls <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Tim Peierls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:59, Gus Mueller wrote:
>> > I was wondering if anyone saw any problems with using a
>> > Dictionary instead of a Hastable in XmlRpc.java
>>
> josh lucas wrote:
> >
>> afaik, we are still trying to stay compatible with 1.1 and
> On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:59, Gus Mueller wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone saw any problems with using a
> > Dictionary instead of a Hastable in XmlRpc.java
>
josh lucas wrote:
>
> afaik, we are still trying to stay compatible with 1.1 and thus
> can't use Dictionary...
Dictionary is si
josh lucas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> afaik, we are still trying to stay compatible with 1.1 and thus can't
> use Dictionary...
I'm pretty sure Dictionary is part of 1.1-
http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.1/docs/api/java.util.Dictionary.html
-gus
--
"Christmas means carnage!" -- Ferdinand,
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:59, Gus Mueller wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone saw any problems with using a Dictionary instead
> of a Hastable in XmlRpc.java for the function writeObject(Object obj)
>
> My problem is, that when using a Hashtable, the order of the objects put
> in are not kept the
I was wondering if anyone saw any problems with using a Dictionary instead
of a Hastable in XmlRpc.java for the function writeObject(Object obj)
My problem is, that when using a Hashtable, the order of the objects put
in are not kept the same (it uses a hash!) so I had created a class that
imp
17 matches
Mail list logo
